Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28807024›Full record

SynthesisJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2017

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of bladder carcinoma.

Ashish M Kamat, Joaquim Bellmunt, Matthew D Galsky, Badrinath R Konety, Donald L Lamm, David Langham, Cheryl T Lee, Matthew I Milowsky, Michael A O'Donnell, Peter H O'Donnell and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enhanced Immune Responses AgainstIndian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prevalence of immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy in advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma following immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashish M KamatUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Pressler Unit 1373, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. akamat@mdanderson.org.
Joaquim BellmuntDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brookline, MA, 02446, USA.
Matthew D GalskyTisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Badrinath R KonetyUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Donald L LammBCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ, 85032, USA.
David LanghamBladder Cancer Advocacy Network, North Carolina Triangle Chapter, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA.
Cheryl T LeeThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Matthew I MilowskyUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Michael A O'DonnellUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Peter H O'DonnellUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Daniel P PetrylakYale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Padmanee SharmaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Eila C SkinnerStanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Guru SonpavdeUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
John A TaylorUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Prasanth AbrahamUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBladder Cancer Advocacy Network · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USStanford University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe University of Kansas Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Minnesota System · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard of care for most patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is immunotherapy with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), which activates the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells and has demonstrated durable clinical benefit. Urologic best-practice guidelines and consensus reports have been developed and strengthened based on data on the timing, dose, and duration of therapy from randomized clinical trials, as well as by critical evaluation of criteria for progression. However, these reports have not penetrated the community, and many patients do not receive appropriate therapy. Additionally, several immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently been approved for treatment of metastatic disease. The approval of immune checkpoint blockade for patients with platinum-resistant or -ineligible metastatic bladder cancer has led to considerations of expanded use for both advanced and, potentially, localized disease. To address these issues and others surrounding the appropriate use of immunotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a Task Force of experts, including physicians, patient advocates, and nurses, to address issues related to patient selection, toxicity management, clinical endpoints, as well as the combination and sequencing of therapies. Following the standard approach established by the Society for other cancers, a systematic literature review and analysis of data, combined with consensus voting was used to generate guidelines. Here, we provide a consensus statement for the use of immunotherapy in patients with bladder cancer, with plans to update these recommendations as the field progresses.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineCarcinomaHumansImmunotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocieties, MedicalStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBCG VaccineBladder cancerConsensus statementGuidelinesImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28807024
PMCPMC5557323
OpenAlexW4237269238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.