Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28806996›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2017

Improved passive catheter tracking with positive contrast for CMR-guided cardiac catheterization using partial saturation (pSAT).

Mari Nieves Velasco Forte, Kuberan Pushparajah, Tobias Schaeffter, Israel Valverde Perez, Kawal Rhode, Bram Ruijsink, Mazen Alhrishy, Nicholas Byrne, Amedeo Chiribiri, Tevfik Ismail and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance: state-of-the-art.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Improved catheter tracking during cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided cardiac catheterization using overlay visualization.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Fick versus flow: a real-time invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (iCMR) reproducibility study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Future Perspectives and New "Frontiers" in Cardiac Rhythmology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Advances in Real-Time MRI-Guided Electrophysiology.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2019
    Article
  20. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Mari Nieves Velasco ForteDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Kuberan PushparajahDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Tobias SchaeffterDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Israel Valverde PerezDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Kawal RhodeDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Bram RuijsinkDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Mazen AlhrishyDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Nicholas ByrneDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Amedeo ChiribiriDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Tevfik IsmailDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Tarique HussainDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Reza RazaviDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Sébastien RoujolDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 3rd Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. sebastien.roujol@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-0552
St Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac catheterization is a common procedure in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) represents a promising alternative approach to fluoroscopy guidance, simultaneous high contrast visualization of catheter, soft tissue and the blood pool remains challenging. In this study, a novel passive tracking technique is proposed for enhanced positive contrast visualization of gadolinium-filled balloon catheters using partial saturation (pSAT) magnetization preparation.

methodsThe proposed pSAT sequence uses a single shot acquisition with balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) readout preceded by a partial saturation pre-pulse. This technique was initially evaluated in five healthy subjects. The pSAT sequence was compared to conventional bSSFP images acquired with (SAT) and without (Non-SAT) saturation pre-pulse. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the catheter balloon, blood and myocardium and the corresponding contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) are reported. Subjective assessment of image suitability for CMR-guidance and ideal pSAT angle was performed by three cardiologists. The feasibility of the pSAT sequence is demonstrated in two adult patients undergoing CMR-guided cardiac catheterization.

resultsThe proposed pSAT approach provided better catheter balloon/blood contrast and catheter balloon/myocardium contrast than conventional Non-SAT sequences. It also resulted in better blood and myocardium SNR than SAT sequences. When averaged over all volunteers, images acquired with a pSAT angle of 20° to 40° enabled simultaneous visualization of the catheter balloon and the cardiovascular anatomy (blood and myocardium) and were found suitable for CMR-guidance in >93% of cases. The pSAT sequence was successfully used in two patients undergoing CMR-guided diagnostic cardiac catheterization.

conclusionsThe proposed pSAT sequence offers real-time, simultaneous, enhanced contrast visualization of the catheter balloon, soft tissues and blood. This technique provides improved passive tracking capabilities during CMR-guided catheterization in patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalAdolescentAdultCardiac CatheterizationCase-Control StudiesContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsPredictive Value of TestsContrast Mediagadoterate meglumineMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsCardiac catheterizationCongenital heart diseaseDevice trackingInterventional CMR

Identifiers

PMID28806996
PMCPMC5556659
OpenAlexW2743884031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.