Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28806964›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2017

Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.

Rabeea'h W Aslam, Maggie Hendry, Andrew Booth, Ben Carter, Joanna M Charles, Noel Craine, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Jane Noyes, Lupetu Ives Ntambwe, Diana Pasterfield and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Repeated adolescent pregnancy in Brazil from 2015 to 2019.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prenatal environmental exposures and associations with teen births.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rabeea'h W AslamDepartment of Biostaistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. r.w.aslam@liverpool.ac.uk.
Maggie HendryNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Andrew BoothSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ben CarterDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Joanna M CharlesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluations, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Noel CrainePublic Health Wales, Bangor, UK.
Rhiannon Tudor EdwardsCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluations, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Jane NoyesSchool of Social Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Lupetu Ives NtambweVeristat, Montreal, Canada.
Diana PasterfieldNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Jo Rycroft-MaloneCentre for Health-Related Research School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Nefyn WilliamsNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Rhiannon WhitakerWhitaker Research Ltd., Bangor, UK.
Bangor University · GBKing's College London · GBPublic Health Wales · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/141/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintended repeat conceptions can result in emotional, psychological and educational harm to young women, often with enduring implications for their life chances. This study aimed to identify which young women are at the greatest risk of repeat unintended pregnancies; which interventions are effective and cost-effective; and what are the barriers to and facilitators for the uptake of these interventions.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods systematic review which included meta-analysis, framework synthesis and application of realist principles, with stakeholder input and service user feedback to address this. We searched 20 electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica database, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts and Research Papers in Economics, to cover a broad range of health, social science, health economics and grey literature sources. Searches were conducted between May 2013 and June 2014 and updated in August 2015.

resultsTwelve randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two quasi-RCTs, 10 qualitative studies and 53 other quantitative studies were identified. The RCTs evaluated psychosocial interventions and an emergency contraception programme. The primary outcome was repeat conception rate: the event rate was 132 of 308 (43%) in the intervention group versus 140 of 289 (48%) for the control group, with a non-significant risk ratio (RR) of 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.08]. Four studies reported subsequent birth rates: 29 of 237 (12%) events for the intervention arm versus 46 out of 224 (21%) for the control arm, with an RR of 0.60 (95% CI 0.39-0.93). Many repeat conceptions occurred in the context of poverty, low expectations and aspirations and negligible opportunities. Qualitative and realist evidence highlighted the importance of context, motivation, future planning and giving young women a central and active role in the development of new interventions.

conclusionsLittle or no evidence for the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of any of the interventions to reduce repeat pregnancy in young women was found. Qualitative and realist evidence helped to explain gaps in intervention design that should be addressed. More theory-based, rigorously evaluated programmes need to be developed to reduce unintended repeat pregnancy in young women.

trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42012003168 . Cochrane registration number: i = fertility/0068.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentContraceptionCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMotivationPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceQualitative ResearchAdolescentChildbearingComplex interventionsContraceptivesPregnancyPrevention

Identifiers

PMID28806964
PMCPMC5557469
OpenAlexW2109370095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.