Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28806925›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Genomic data illuminates demography, genetic structure and selection of a popular dog breed.

Pamela Wiener, Enrique Sánchez-Molano, Dylan N Clements, John A Woolliams, Marie J Haskell, Sarah C Blott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The German Shorthair Pointer Dog Breed (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?Frontiers in zoology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela WienerRoslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Scotland, UK. pam.wiener@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
Enrique Sánchez-MolanoRoslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Scotland, UK.
Dylan N ClementsRoslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Scotland, UK.
John A WoolliamsRoslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Scotland, UK.
Marie J HaskellScotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Sarah C BlottUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, England, UK.
Roslin Institute · GBScotland's Rural College · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H017798/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H019073/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05191132Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211553Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic methods have proved to be important tools in the analysis of genetic diversity across the range of species and can be used to reveal processes underlying both short- and long-term evolutionary change. This study applied genomic methods to investigate population structure and inbreeding in a common UK dog breed, the Labrador Retriever.

resultsWe found substantial within-breed genetic differentiation, which was associated with the role of the dog (i.e. working, pet, show) and also with coat colour (i.e. black, yellow, brown). There was little evidence of geographical differentiation. Highly differentiated genomic regions contained genes and markers associated with skull shape, suggesting that at least some of the differentiation is related to human-imposed selection on this trait. We also found that the total length of homozygous segments (runs of homozygosity, ROHs) was highly correlated with inbreeding coefficient.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that high-density genomic data can be used to quantify genetic diversity and to decipher demographic and selection processes. Analysis of genetically differentiated regions in the UK Labrador Retriever population suggests the possibility of human-imposed selection on craniofacial characteristics. The high correlation between estimates of inbreeding from genomic and pedigree data for this breed demonstrates that genomic approaches can be used to quantify inbreeding levels in dogs, which will be particularly useful where pedigree information is missing.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsDogsFemaleGenotypeHomozygoteInbreedingLinkage DisequilibriumMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideCanine geneticsCraniofacial morphologyDogsGenetic differentiationPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID28806925
PMCPMC5557481
OpenAlexW2746479135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.