Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28806908›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Changing the default for tobacco-cessation treatment in an inpatient setting: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Babalola Faseru, Edward F Ellerbeck, Delwyn Catley, Byron J Gajewski, Taneisha S Scheuermann, Theresa I Shireman, Laura M Mussulman, Niaman Nazir, Terry Bush, Kimber P Richter

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02721082 phase4completednot on this map

Changing the Default for Tobacco Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,000ConditionsTobacco Use CessationArmsOpt Out Treatment Program, Nicotine Replacement Therapy, Opt In Treatment Program
NCT04502004 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Smoking Cessation in Hospitalized Patients: Efficacy of an Intensive Intervention Program Using an App

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the Balearic IslandsRan2019 to 2021Enrolled116ConditionsHospitalized Smokers, CBT, Smoking Cessation, MhealthArmsApp for health=mhealth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials: from myths to practical considerations.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Presumed Consent With Opt-Out: An Ethical Consent Approach to Automatically Refer Patients With Cancer to Tobacco Treatment Services.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Strategies for Referring Cancer Patients in a Smoking Cessation Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Babalola FaseruDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. bfaseru@kumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3805-1850
Edward F EllerbeckDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Delwyn CatleyChildren's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Byron J GajewskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Taneisha S ScheuermannDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Theresa I ShiremanBrown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Laura M MussulmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Niaman NazirDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Terry BushOptum, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kimber P RichterDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USBrown University · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USOptum (United States) · US

Funding

Changing the Default for Tobacco TreatmentR01HL131512 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHTER, KIMBER P · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost health care providers do not treat tobacco dependence routinely. This may in part be due to the treatment "default." Current treatment guidelines recommend that providers (1) ask patients if they are willing to quit and (2) provide cessation-focused medications and counseling only to smokers who state that they are willing to quit. The default is that patients have to "opt in" to receive cessation assistance: providers ask smokers if they are willing to quit, and only offer medications and cessation support to those who say "yes." This drastically limits the reach of cessation services because, at any given encounter, only one in three smokers say that they are ready to quit. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of providing all smokers with tobacco-cessation treatment unless they refuse it (OPT OUT) versus current practice-screening for readiness and only offering treatment to smokers who say they are ready to quit (OPT IN).

methodsThis individually randomized clinical trial is conducted in a tertiary-care hospital. We will conduct the trial among up to 1000 randomly selected hospitalized smokers to determine the population impact of changing the treatment default, identify mediators of outcome, and determine the cost-effectiveness of this new, highly proactive approach. This is a population-based study that targets an endpoint of vital interest; applies minimal eligibility criteria to broaden generalizability; and utilizes hospital staff for interventions to ensure long-term sustainability. The study employs delayed consent and an innovative Bayesian adaptive design to evaluate a major shift in our approach to care. If effective, this change would expand the reach of tobacco-cessation treatment from 30% to 100% of smokers. DISCUSSION: Regardless of outcome, the trial will provide a model of how to alter and evaluate the impact of health care defaults. If OPT OUT proves to be more effective, it will expand the population eligible for cessation treatment by over 300%. It will also simplify the tobacco-cessation treatment algorithm, and relieve busy health care providers of the burden of evaluating readiness to quit.

trial registrationClinical Trials Registration, ID: NCT02721082 . Registered on 22 March 2016.

Indexed as

CounselingInpatientsPatient Acceptance of Health CareTobacco Use Cessation DevicesClinical ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKansasMotivationNicotinic AgonistsProspective StudiesRecurrenceResearch DesignSmokersSmokingNicotinic AgonistsHospitalMotivationRandomized clinical trialSmoking cessationTobacco use disorderTreatment guidelines

Identifiers

PMID28806908
PMCPMC5556365
OpenAlexW2749439313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.