Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28806777›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

A 'synthetic-sickness' screen for senescence re-engagement targets in mutant cancer backgrounds.

Claire J Cairney, Lauren S Godwin, Alan E Bilsland, Sharon Burns, Katrina H Stevenson, Lynn McGarry, John Revie, Jon D Moore, Ceri M Wiggins, Rebecca S Collinson and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Structure and regulation of human epithelial cell transforming 2 protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Claire J CairneyInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6531-245X
Lauren S GodwinMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Alan E BilslandInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Sharon BurnsInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-7347
Katrina H StevensonInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Lynn McGarryRNAi Screening Facility, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7055-2615
John RevieInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-925X
Jon D MooreHorizon Discovery Ltd, Cambridge Research Park, Waterbeach, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ceri M WigginsHorizon Discovery Ltd, Cambridge Research Park, Waterbeach, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rebecca S CollinsonMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Clare MuddHorizon Discovery Ltd, Cambridge Research Park, Waterbeach, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Elpida TsonouHorizon Discovery Ltd, Cambridge Research Park, Waterbeach, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-3391
Mahito SadaieCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dorothy C BennettMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Masashi NaritaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-577X
Christopher J TorrancePhoreMost Ltd, Baraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
W Nicol KeithInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
University of Glasgow · GBHorizon Discovery (United Kingdom) · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBCancer Research UK Scotland Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15890Cancer Research UK 24453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senescence is a universal barrier to immortalisation and tumorigenesis. As such, interest in the use of senescence-induction in a therapeutic context has been gaining momentum in the past few years; however, senescence and immortalisation remain underserved areas for drug discovery owing to a lack of robust senescence inducing agents and an incomplete understanding of the signalling events underlying this complex process. In order to address this issue we undertook a large-scale morphological siRNA screen for inducers of senescence phenotypes in the human melanoma cell line A375P. Following rescreen and validation in a second cancer cell line, HCT116 colorectal carcinoma, a panel of 16 of the most robust hits were selected for further validation based on significance and the potential to be targeted by drug-like molecules. Using secondary assays for detection of senescence biomarkers p21, 53BP1 and senescence associated beta-galactosidase (SAβGal) in a panel of HCT116 cell lines carrying cancer-relevant mutations, we show that partial senescence phenotypes can be induced to varying degrees in a context dependent manner, even in the absence of p21 or p53 expression. However, proliferation arrest varied among genetic backgrounds with predominantly toxic effects in p21 null cells, while cells lacking PI3K mutation failed to arrest. Furthermore, we show that the oncogene ECT2 induces partial senescence phenotypes in all mutant backgrounds tested, demonstrating a dependence on activating KRASG13D for growth suppression and a complete senescence response. These results suggest a potential mechanism to target mutant KRAS signalling through ECT2 in cancers that are reliant on activating KRAS mutations and remain refractory to current treatments.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplasticbeta-GalactosidaseCaspase 3Caspase 7Cell ProliferationCellular SenescenceCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Genetic MarkersHCT116 CellsHumansMelanomaMutationPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Small InterferingTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1beta-GalactosidaseCASP3 protein, humanCASP7 protein, humanCaspase 3Caspase 7CDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Genetic MarkersPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesRNA, Small InterferingTP53BP1 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID28806777
PMCPMC5570495
OpenAlexW2749253201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.