Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28805794›Full record

ArticleNature methods2017

Large-scale mapping of cortical synaptic projections with extracellular electrode arrays.

Mark Shein-Idelson, Lorenz Pammer, Mike Hemberger, Gilles Laurent

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Opportunities and Challenges of Brain-on-a-Chip Interfaces.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark Shein-IdelsonMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lorenz PammerMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Mike HembergerMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gilles LaurentMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-114X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding circuit computation in the nervous system requires sampling activity over large neural populations and maximizing the number of features that can be extracted. By combining planar arrays of extracellular electrodes with the three-layered cortex of turtles, we show that synaptic signals induced along individual axons as well as action potentials can be easily captured. Two types of information can be extracted from these signals, the neuronal subtype (inhibitory or excitatory)-whose identification is more reliable than with traditional measures such as action potential width-and a (partial) spatial map of functional axonal projections from individual neurons. Because our approach is algorithmic, it can be carried out in parallel on hundreds of simultaneously recorded neurons. Combining our approach with soma triangulation, we reveal an axonal projection bias among a population of pyramidal neurons in turtle cortex and confirm this bias through anatomical reconstructions.

Indexed as

MicroelectrodesAnimalsCerebral CortexConnectomeElectroencephalographyEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisPyramidal CellsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySynapsesTissue Array AnalysisTurtles

Identifiers

PMID28805794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.