Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28805136›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2017

Andrzej Brzezinski, Salim A Ghodbane, Jay M Patel, Barbara A Perry, Charles J Gatt, Michael G Dunn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meniscal repair: The current state and recent advances in augmentation.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An ovine knee simulator: description and proof of concept.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Adult ovine chondrocytes in expansion culture adopt progenitor cell properties that are favorable for cartilage tissue engineering.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances inInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrzej Brzezinski1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Salim A Ghodbane1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Jay M Patel1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Barbara A Perry1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Charles J Gatt1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Michael G Dunn1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USJohnson University · US

Funding

UMDNJ TRAINING GRANT IN BIOTECHNOLOGYT32GM008339 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI YARMUSH, MARTIN L · 1989 to 2019
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meniscus injuries represent one of the most-common intra-articular knee injuries. The current treatment options include meniscectomy and allograft transplantation, both with poor long-term outcomes. Therefore, there is a need for regenerative techniques to restore meniscal function. To preclinically test scaffolds for meniscus replacement, large animal models need to be established and standardized. This review establishes the anatomical and compositional similarities between human and sheep menisci and provides guidance for implantation and evaluation of such devices. The ovine meniscus represents a scaled-down version of the human meniscus, with only slight structural differences that can be addressed during device fabrication. Implantation protocols in sheep remain a challenge, as the meniscus cannot be visualized with the arthroscopic-assisted procedures commonly performed in human patients. Thus, we recommend the appropriate implantation protocols for meniscus visualization, ligamentous restoration, and surgical fixation of both total and partial meniscus replacement devices. Last, due to the lack of standardization in evaluation techniques, we recommend a comprehensive battery of tests to evaluate the efficacy of meniscus replacement implants. We recommend other investigators utilize these surgical and testing techniques to establish the ovine model as the gold standard for preclinical evaluation of meniscus replacement devices.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalProsthesis ImplantationAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaJointsMeniscusSheepTissue Engineeringanatomy and physiologylarge animal modelmeniscus tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID28805136
PMCPMC5749605
OpenAlexW2743520279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.