Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28804855›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2017

Human heart failure with preserved ejection versus feline cardiomyopathy: what can we learn from both veterinary and human medicine?

Valentine Prat, Bertrand Rozec, Chantal Gauthier, Benjamin Lauzier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentine Pratl'institut du thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France. valentine.prat@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-6958
Bertrand Rozecl'institut du thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Chantal Gauthierl'institut du thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France.
Benjamin Lauzierl'institut du thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular affections are a growing health burden in human populations. Recent advances in cardiology have improved treatments and outcomes for myocardial infarction and arrhythmias, but other conditions still remain poorly understood. To date, the classical approach to study cardiovascular diseases involves rodent models, despite their strong differences with human cardiac physiology. In this context, this review will focus on the common traits between human and feline cardiac diseases, namely heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and feline cardiomyopathies, respectively. These two affections share similar pathological patterns and epidemiological characteristics. An improved knowledge would be of interest for both human and feline patients and could lead to the establishment of a more accurate treatment and therapeutic strategy for medical doctors and veterinary practitioners.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathiesCatsHeart FailureHumansStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftDiabetesDiastolic dysfunctionFeline cardiomyopathyHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionHypertensionObesity

Identifiers

PMID28804855
OpenAlexW2743948785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.