Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28804752›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2017

Understanding Mixed Emotions: Paradigms and Measures.

Sylvia D Kreibig, James J Gross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Sleep and affect: A conceptual review.Sleep medicine reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. "Awe-scillations": EEG spectral and complexity representations of awe.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Music, Pleasure, and Meaning: The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motivations for Music (HEMM) Scale.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sylvia D KreibigDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Funding

Emotion Dysregulation and Sleep-Time Masticatory Muscle Activity in Sleep Bruxism R01DE026771R01DE026771 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, JAMES J · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Emotion Dysregulation and Sleep-Time Masticatory Muscle Activity in Sleep BruxismR56DE025321 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, JAMES J · 2016 to 2016
$225k
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026771NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE025321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we examine the paradigms and measures available for experimentally studying mixed emotions in the laboratory. For eliciting mixed emotions, we describe a mixed emotions film library that allows for the repeated elicitation of a specific homogeneous mixed emotional state and appropriately matched pure positive, pure negative, and neutral emotional states. For assessing mixed emotions, we consider subjective and objective measures that fall into univariate, bivariate, and multivariate measurement categories. As paradigms and measures for objectively studying mixed emotions are still in their early stages, we conclude by outlining future directions that focus on the reliability, temporal dynamics, and response coherence of mixed emotions paradigms and measures. This research will build a strong foundation for future studies and significantly advance our understanding of mixed emotions.

Indexed as

facial expressionmixed emotionsobjective measuresphysiologysubjective feelings

Identifiers

PMID28804752
PMCPMC5548140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.