Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28804600›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2017

Analysis of health economics assessment reports for pharmaceuticals in France - understanding the underlying philosophy of CEESP assessment.

Mondher Toumi, Anastasiia Motrunich, Aurélie Millier, Cécile Rémuzat, Christos Chouaid, Bruno Falissard, Samuel Aballéa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Do France, Germany, and Italy agree on the added therapeutic value of medicines?International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mondher ToumiFaculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Santé Publique, Aix-Marseille Université, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille Cedex, France.
Anastasiia MotrunichHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Aurélie MillierHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Cécile RémuzatHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Christos ChouaidFaculté de médecine, INSERM U955 and Université Paris Est (UPEC)UMR U955, Créteil, France.
Bruno FalissardINSERM Unit U669 (Public Health and Mental Health), University Paris-Sud, Paris, France.
Samuel AballéaFaculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Santé Publique, Aix-Marseille Université, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CEESPefficiency opinionHASHAS guidelineshealth economics analysisHealth technology assessmentHTApricing

Identifiers

PMID28804600
PMCPMC5533125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.