ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2017
Effect of omiganan on colonic anastomosis healing in a rat model of peritonitis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Forging a New Frontier: Antimicrobial Peptides and Nanotechnology Converging to Conquer Gastrointestinal Pathogens.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- The Study of Antistaphylococcal Potential of Omiganan and Retro-Omiganan Under Flow Conditions.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Experimental models of high-risk bowel anastomosis in rats: A systematic review.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Improved Healing of Colonic Anastomosis with Allotransplantation of Axillary Skin Fibroblasts in Rats.Cell journal · 2022Article
- Innate Inspiration: Antifungal Peptides and Other Immunotherapeutics From the Host Immune Response.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Healing of colonic anastomosis in rats under obstructive ileus conditions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigates the effects of the antimicrobial cationic peptide omiganan-alone and combined with the antibiotic imipenem-on colonic anastomosis healing in presence of intraperitoneal sepsis induced in a rodent model of cecal ligation and puncture (CLP).
methodsForty male Wistar rats were divided into 5 groups of 8 animals. Group 1 (control group) underwent laparotomy and cecal mobilization and the next day received left colon anastomosis. In group 2 (CLP without treatment), group 3 (CLP + imipenem), group 4 (CLP + omiganan), and group 5 (CLP + omiganan + imipenem), the left colon anastomosis was performed the day after CLP. Imipenem and omiganan were administered by intraperitoneal injection immediately before anastomosis construction and subsequently at 24 h intervals until the 7th postoperative day, when rats were sacrificed. Anastomotic bursting pressure was measured in situ. Tissue samples were collected for determination of hydroxyproline content and histological characteristics.
resultsOnly rats receiving omiganan + imipenem displayed re-epithelialization, reduced neovascularization of granulation tissue, and a bursting pressure that was similar to that of controls. Omiganan-alone and combined with imipenem-was associated with a better control of inflammatory parameters than imipenem alone. In addition omiganan, like imipenem, counteracted the collagen depletion typical of sepsis.
conclusionsThis experimental study demonstrates the efficacy of the new antimicrobial agent omiganan, alone and in combination with imipenem, in delaying the effects of intraperitoneal sepsis on colonic anastomosis healing and provides evidence of the value of omiganan as a therapeutic agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28804554PMC5553886W2749958723What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.