Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28804473›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the French Version of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale.

Joséphine Chaix, Philippe Golay, Caroline Fankhauser, Alexandra Nguyen, Diane C Gooding, Jérôme Favrod

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02593058 (Positive Emotions Program for Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02593058 nacompletednot on this map

Positive Emotions Program for Schizophrenia (PEPS): A Randomized Controlled Study on Improving Pleasure and Motivation in Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut et Haute Ecole de la Santé la SourceRan2016 to 2018Enrolled80ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizoaffective DisorderArmsPositive Emotions Program for Schizophrenia, Treatment As Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical and Preclinical Assessments of Anhedonia in Psychiatric Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joséphine ChaixSchool of Nursing Sciences La Source, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western SwitzerlandLausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe GolayCommunity Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital CenterLausanne, Switzerland.
Caroline FankhauserSchool of Nursing Sciences La Source, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western SwitzerlandLausanne, Switzerland.
Alexandra NguyenSchool of Nursing Sciences La Source, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western SwitzerlandLausanne, Switzerland.
Diane C GoodingDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, United States.
Jérôme FavrodSchool of Nursing Sciences La Source, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western SwitzerlandLausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS), a measure specifically designed to assess hedonic capacity for social and interpersonal pleasure, was used to evaluate the presence of social anhedonia in patients as well as the general population. The first goal of this study was to validate the structure of the French version of the ACIPS. The second objective was to verify whether a one, two or three factor solution is most appropriate for the ACIPS scale. The French version of the ACIPS was tested on 263 French-speaking pre-graduate students or professional volunteers. For the confirmatory factor analysis, data were treated as categorical ordinal and all the models were estimated using a robust weighted least squares estimator with adjustments for the mean and variance. Three models were estimated. A one-factor model representing a general undifferentiated "pleasure" latent construct was first tested on the 17 ACIPS items. A two-factor model distinguishing anticipatory-pleasure and consummatory-pleasure was tested next. Finally, a three-factor model including subdomains of intimate social interactions, group social interactions, and social bonding was tested. The one and two-factor models showed a somewhat poor fit to the data. However, the goodness of fit of the three factor model was adequate. These results suggest that individuals who enjoyed interaction in one of these three subdomains were more likely to enjoy doing so in the two other domains. However, on the basis of the comparison between the one and three factor models, these three types of interactions may not be considered as indistinguishable. Rather, they represent distinct and theoretically meaningful dimensions. These results show the French version of the ACIPS is a useful and valid scale to measure the capacity of savoring different kinds of social relationships.

Indexed as

ACIPSbondingconfirmatory factor analysisself–report scalesocial anhedoniavalidation

Identifiers

PMID28804473
PMCPMC5532448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.