ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings2016
Qualitative causal analyses of biosimulation models.
Article in CEUR workshop proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SemGen: a tool for semantics-based annotation and composition of biosimulation models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Identifying frequent patterns in biochemical reaction networks: a workflow.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe an approach for performing qualitative, systems-level causal analyses on biosimulation models that leverages semantics-based modeling formats, formal ontology, and automated inference. The approach allows users to quickly investigate how a qualitative perturbation to an element within a model's network (an increment or decrement) propagates throughout the modeled system. To support such analyses, we must interpret and annotate the semantics of the models, including both the physical properties modeled and the dependencies that relate them. We build from prior work understanding the semantics of biological properties, but here, we focus on the semantics for dependencies, which provide the critical knowledge necessary for causal analysis of biosimulation models. We describe augmentations to the Ontology of Physics for Biology, via OWL axioms and SWRL rules, and demonstrate that a reasoner can then infer how an annotated model's physical properties influence each other in a qualitative sense. Our goal is to provide researchers with a tool that helps bring the systems-level network dynamics of biosimulation models into perspective, thus facilitating model development, testing, and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28804276PMC5551042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.