Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28804276›Full record

ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings2016

Qualitative causal analyses of biosimulation models.

Maxwell L Neal, John H Gennari, Daniel L Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CEUR workshop proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Identifying frequent patterns in biochemical reaction networks: a workflow.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maxwell L NealDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
John H GennariDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Daniel L CookDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

The Virtual Physiological Rat ProjectP50GM094503 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BEARD, DANIEL A · 2011 to 2015
$11.6M
Analyzing the Cardiac Power Grid: Adaptive responses to fluctuating local demandU01HL122199 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BEARD, DANIEL A, DASH, RANJAN K · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
Physiological Knowledge Integration and Recombinant Modeling Via Accelerated SemaR01LM011969 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CARLSON, BRIAN E., GENNARI, JOHN H. · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL122199NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM094503NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe an approach for performing qualitative, systems-level causal analyses on biosimulation models that leverages semantics-based modeling formats, formal ontology, and automated inference. The approach allows users to quickly investigate how a qualitative perturbation to an element within a model's network (an increment or decrement) propagates throughout the modeled system. To support such analyses, we must interpret and annotate the semantics of the models, including both the physical properties modeled and the dependencies that relate them. We build from prior work understanding the semantics of biological properties, but here, we focus on the semantics for dependencies, which provide the critical knowledge necessary for causal analysis of biosimulation models. We describe augmentations to the Ontology of Physics for Biology, via OWL axioms and SWRL rules, and demonstrate that a reasoner can then infer how an annotated model's physical properties influence each other in a qualitative sense. Our goal is to provide researchers with a tool that helps bring the systems-level network dynamics of biosimulation models into perspective, thus facilitating model development, testing, and application.

Indexed as

automated inferencebiological modelingbiosimulationnetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID28804276
PMCPMC5551042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.