Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28804170›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2017

Decentralized care for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jennifer Ho, Anthony L Byrne, Nguyen N Linh, Ernesto Jaramillo, Greg J Fox

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05671718 (Bring BPaL2Me Trial Comparing Nurse-Led RR-TB Treatment in Primary Care to Physician-Led, Hospital-Based Outpatient RR-TB Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05671718 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Bring BPaL2Me Trial Comparing Nurse-Led RR-TB Treatment in Primary Care to Physician-Led, Hospital-Based Outpatient RR-TB Treatment: A Cluster Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2023 to 2030Enrolled2,944ConditionsDrug Resistant TuberculosisArmsNurse-Led Treatment in Primary Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of interventions for reducing TB incidence in countries with low TB incidence: a systematic review of reviews.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tuberculosis care models for children and adolescents: a scoping review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Cost of TB services: approach and summary findings of a multi-country study (Value TB).The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer HoWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, 431 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, New South Wales 2037, Australia.
Anthony L ByrneWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, 431 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, New South Wales 2037, Australia.
Nguyen N LinhGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ernesto JaramilloGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Greg J FoxCentral Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of decentralized treatment and care for patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, in comparison with centralized approaches.

methodsWe searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane library, Embase®, Google Scholar, LILACS, PubMed®, Web of Science and the World Health Organization's portal of clinical trials for studies reporting treatment outcomes for decentralized and centralized care of MDR tuberculosis. The primary outcome was treatment success. When possible, we also evaluated, death, loss to follow-up, treatment adherence and health-system costs. To obtain pooled relative risk (RR) estimates, we performed random-effects meta-analyses.

findingsEight studies met the eligibility criteria for review inclusion. Six cohort studies, with 4026 participants in total, reported on treatment outcomes. The pooled RR estimate for decentralized versus centralized care for treatment success was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.01-1.27). The corresponding estimate for loss to follow-up was RR: 0.66 (95% CI: 0.38-1.13), for death RR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.67-1.52) and for treatment failure was RR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.48-2.40). Two of three studies evaluating health-care costs reported lower costs for the decentralized models of care than for the centralized models.

conclusionTreatment success was more likely among patients with MDR tuberculosis treated using a decentralized approach. Further studies are required to explore the effectiveness of decentralized MDR tuberculosis care in a range of different settings.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDelivery of Health CareHealth ExpendituresHumansMedication AdherenceTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID28804170
PMCPMC5537756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.