Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28804169›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2017

A cohort study of low birth weight and health outcomes in the first year of life, Ghana.

Maureen O'Leary, Karen Edmond, Sian Floyd, Sam Newton, Gyan Thomas, Sara L Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health of Infants Born to Venezuelan Refugees in Colombia.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maureen O'LearyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, England.
Karen EdmondSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Sian FloydDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, England.
Sam NewtonDepartment of Community Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Gyan ThomasKintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana.
Sara L ThomasDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of birth weight on infant mortality, illness and care seeking in rural Ghana.

methodsUsing randomized controlled trial data, we compared infants weighing 2.00-2.49, 1.50-1.99 and < 1.50 kg with non-low-birth-weight infants. We generated adjusted mortality hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted illness rate ratios (aRR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for health-facility admissions and absence of care seeking for four time periods: infancy, the neonatal period, early infancy and late infancy - represented by ages of 0-364, 0-27, 28-182 and 183-364 days, respectively.

findingsAmong 22 906 infants, compared with non-low-birth-weight infants: (i) infants weighing 2.00-2.49, 1.50-1.99 and < 1.50 kg were about two (aHR: 2.13; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.76-2.59), eight (aHR: 8.21; 95% CI: 6.26-10.76) and 25 (aHR: 25.38; 95% CI: 18.36-35.10) times more likely to die in infancy, respectively; (ii) those born weighing < 1.50 kg were about 48 (aHR: 48.45; 95% CI: 32.81-71.55) and eight (aHR: 8.42; 95% CI: 3.09-22.92) times more likely to die in the neonatal period and late infancy, respectively; (iii) those born weighing 1.50-1.99 kg (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27-1.95) or < 1.50 kg (aRR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.13-2.21) had higher neonatal illness rates; and (iv) for those born weighing 1.50-1.99 kg, care was less likely to be sought in the neonatal period (aOR: 3.30; 95% CI: 1.98-5.48) and early infancy (aOR : 1.74; 95% CI: 1.26-2.39).

conclusionFor low-birth-weight infants in Ghana, strategies to minimize mortality and improve care seeking are needed.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightInfant MortalityCohort StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOdds RatioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient AdmissionPerinatal MortalityRural PopulationSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID28804169
PMCPMC5537746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.