Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28803549›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

Comparative gut microbiota and resistome profiling of intensive care patients receiving selective digestive tract decontamination and healthy subjects.

Elena Buelow, Teresita D J Bello González, Susana Fuentes, Wouter A A de Steenhuijsen Piters, Leo Lahti, Jumamurat R Bayjanov, Eline A M Majoor, Johanna C Braat, Maaike S M van Mourik, Evelien A N Oostdijk and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. The effect of selective decontamination on the intestinal microbiota as measured with IS-pro: a taxonomic classification tool applicable for direct evaluation of intestinal microbiota in clinical routine.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Burns & trauma · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Elena BuelowDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Teresita D J Bello GonzálezLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Susana FuentesLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wouter A A de Steenhuijsen PitersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leo LahtiLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jumamurat R BayjanovDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eline A M MajoorDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johanna C BraatDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maaike S M van MourikDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evelien A N OostdijkDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rob J L WillemsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marc J M BontenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mark W J van PasselLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Willem van SchaikDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. w.vanschaik@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5832-0988
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLWageningen University & Research · NLInserm · FRIntravacc (Netherlands) · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUniversity of Turku · FIUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut microbiota is a reservoir of opportunistic pathogens that can cause life-threatening infections in critically ill patients during their stay in an intensive care unit (ICU). To suppress gut colonization with opportunistic pathogens, a prophylactic antibiotic regimen, termed "selective decontamination of the digestive tract" (SDD), is used in some countries where it improves clinical outcome in ICU patients. Yet, the impact of ICU hospitalization and SDD on the gut microbiota remains largely unknown. Here, we characterize the composition of the gut microbiota and its antimicrobial resistance genes ("the resistome") of ICU patients during SDD and of healthy subjects.

resultsFrom ten patients that were acutely admitted to the ICU, 30 fecal samples were collected during ICU stay. Additionally, feces were collected from five of these patients after transfer to a medium-care ward and cessation of SDD. Feces from ten healthy subjects were collected twice, with a 1-year interval. Gut microbiota and resistome composition were determined using 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic profiling and nanolitre-scale quantitative PCRs. The microbiota of the ICU patients differed from the microbiota of healthy subjects and was characterized by lower microbial diversity, decreased levels of Escherichia coli and of anaerobic Gram-positive, butyrate-producing bacteria of the Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa, and an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes and enterococci. Four resistance genes (aac(6')-Ii, ermC, qacA, tetQ), providing resistance to aminoglycosides, macrolides, disinfectants, and tetracyclines, respectively, were significantly more abundant among ICU patients than in healthy subjects, while a chloramphenicol resistance gene (catA) and a tetracycline resistance gene (tetW) were more abundant in healthy subjects.

conclusionsThe gut microbiota of SDD-treated ICU patients deviated strongly from the gut microbiota of healthy subjects. The negative effects on the resistome were limited to selection for four resistance genes. While it was not possible to disentangle the effects of SDD from confounding variables in the patient cohort, our data suggest that the risks associated with ICU hospitalization and SDD on selection for antibiotic resistance are limited. However, we found evidence indicating that recolonization of the gut by antibiotic-resistant bacteria may occur upon ICU discharge and cessation of SDD.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisIntensive Care UnitsAgedAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCritical IllnessDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHealthy VolunteersHospitalizationHumansMacrolidesAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-bacterial agentsAntibiotic prophylaxisDrug resistanceIntensive careMicrobialMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID28803549
PMCPMC5554972
OpenAlexW2739852532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.