Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28803427›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2017

Unknown onset ischemic strokes in patients last-seen-well >4.5 h: differences between wake-up and daytime-unwitnessed strokes.

Luuk Dekker, Hajo Hund, Robin Lemmens, Jelis Boiten, Ido van den Wijngaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Circulating Interleukin-6 Levels and Timing of Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Comparison of TJournal of central nervous system disease · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luuk DekkerDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands. dekkerluuk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0958-2081
Hajo HundDepartment of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Robin LemmensDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND), KU Leuven-University of Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Jelis BoitenDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Ido van den WijngaardDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with unknown time of stroke onset (UOS) represent around one-third of ischemic stroke patients. These are patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) or daytime-unwitnessed stroke (DUS), often presenting outside the time-window for reperfusion therapy. UOS patients presenting between 4.5 and 12 h after time of last-seen-well were included. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between WUS and DUS patients. Good functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale of ≤2 at follow-up. Sixty-one UOS patients were included: 42 WUS and 19 DUS patients. Stroke severity at presentation was mild to moderate with a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 5 in WUS and 6 in DUS patients. Time between last-seen-well and presentation at the hospital was shorter in patients with DUS compared to WUS (506 vs 362 min, p < 0.01). CT imaging results were similar, with a median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score of 10 for both WUS and DUS patients. After correction for age and NIHSS at presentation, no difference in good functional outcome was found between WUS (52%) and DUS (22%). In patients with unknown onset ischemic strokes presenting between 4.5 and 12 h after time of last-seen-well, clinical and radiological features were in large part similar between WUS and DUS. The outcome in the overall cohort was rather poor despite a favorable neuroimaging profile at presentation. These findings underscore the need for clinical trials in patients in whom stroke onset time is unknown.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePatient AdmissionSeverity of Illness IndexAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeTime FactorsDaytime unwitnessedIschemic strokeUnknown onsetWake up

Identifiers

PMID28803427
PMCPMC5565646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.