Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28803409›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2018

Comparative 16SrDNA Gene-Based Microbiota Profiles of the Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and the Mediterranean Mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from a Shellfish Farm (Ligurian Sea, Italy).

Luigi Vezzulli, L Stagnaro, C Grande, G Tassistro, L Canesi, C Pruzzo

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cross-talk and mutual shaping between the immune system and the microbiota during an oyster's life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Metataxonomic analysis of tissue-associated microbiota in grooved carpet-shell (Ruditapes decussatus) and Manila (Ruditapes philippinarum) clams.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luigi VezzulliDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. luigi.vezzulli@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4368-1454
L StagnaroDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
C GrandeDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
G TassistroDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
L CanesiDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
C PruzzoDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
University of Genoa · IT

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 678589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas and the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis are two widely farmed bivalve species which show contrasting behaviour in relation to microbial diseases, with C. gigas being more susceptible and M. galloprovincialis being generally resistant. In a recent study, we showed that different susceptibility to infection exhibited by these two bivalve species may depend on their different capability to kill invading pathogens (e.g., Vibrio spp.) through the action of haemolymph components. Specific microbial-host interactions may also impact bivalve microbiome structure and further influence susceptibility/resistance to microbial diseases. To further investigate this concept, a comparative study of haemolymph and digestive gland 16SrDNA gene-based bacterial microbiota profiles in C. gigas and M. galloprovincialis co-cultivated at the same aquaculture site was carried out using pyrosequencing. Bacterial communities associated with bivalve tissues (hemolymph and digestive gland) were significantly different from those of seawater, and were dominated by relatively few genera such as Vibrio and Pseudoalteromonas. In general, Vibrio accounted for a larger fraction of the microbiota in C. gigas (on average 1.7-fold in the haemolymph) compared to M. galloprovincialis, suggesting that C. gigas may provide better conditions for survival for these bacteria, including potential pathogenic species such as V. aestuarianus. Vibrios appeared to be important members of C. gigas and M. galloprovincialis microbiota and might play a contrasting role in health and disease of bivalve species. Accordingly, microbiome analyses performed on bivalve specimens subjected to commercial depuration highlighted the ineffectiveness of such practice in removing Vibrio species from bivalve tissues.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsAquacultureBacteriaCrassostreaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalGastrointestinal TractHemolymphItalyMytilusPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeawaterShellfishDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16SrDNACrassostrea gigasMicrobiotaMytilus galloprovincialisNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28803409
OpenAlexW2743095842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.