Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28803339›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2018

Dual-energy computed tomography has limited diagnostic sensitivity for short-term gout.

Ertao Jia, Junqing Zhu, Wenhui Huang, Xiaoguang Chen, Juan Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05698680 (Pragmatic, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Prednisolone Versus Colchicine for Acute Gout in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05698680 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Pragmatic, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Prednisolone Versus Colchicine for Acute Gout in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medicine GreifswaldRan2023 to 2026Enrolled186ConditionsAcute GoutArmsPrednisolone 30 mg Tablet, Colchicine 0.5 mg Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Imaging of gout: an atlas.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Ultrasound Features in Gout: An Overview.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. What Has Dual Energy CT Taught Us About Gout?Current rheumatology reports · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ertao JiaThe Department of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Junqing ZhuThe Department of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Wenhui HuangThe Department of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Xiaoguang ChenThe Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control for Emerging Infectious Diseases of Guangdong Higher Institutes, Department of Pathogen Biology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Juan LiThe Department of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China. lj40038@126.com.
Southern Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to discuss the diagnostic value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in patients with gout during different disease phases. Two hundred twenty-one patients (136 with gout and 85 with other arthritic diseases) were recruited to the study. Arthrosis pain was evaluated in all patients by DECT scans. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of DECT for the diagnosis of gout, including the first onset period, less than 24 months period, and more than 24 months period. We then investigated the related risk factors of urate crystals volume in the foot. The diagnostic sensitivity of DECT in the first onset, less than 24 months, and more than 24 months groups was 35.71, 61.54, and 92.86%, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity values were 80.88 and 88.24%, respectively. The multilinear regression analysis showed that longer disease duration (P = 0.001) and higher serum uric acid (SUA) (P = 0.001) were the two important predictive factors of the monosodium urate (MSU) crystal volume in the foot. DECT provides good diagnostic accuracy for detection of MSU crystal deposits in gout patients. However, DECT has limited diagnostic sensitivity for short-term gout patients, especially for the first onset patients. Longer disease duration and higher SUA were predictive factors of MSU crystal volume.

Indexed as

FemaleGoutHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedClinical trialsDisease durationDual-energy computed tomographyGout

Identifiers

PMID28803339
PMCPMC5835052
OpenAlexW2744521989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.