ArticlePediatric surgery international2017
Intraoperative ventilation during thoracoscopic repair of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive meta-analysis of surgical procedure for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: thoracoscopic versus open repair.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Pooled it
- Respiratory Support Strategies for Surgical Neonates: A Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Exploration of the thoracoscopic treatment of esophageal atresia under high-frequency ventilation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Respiratory Support of Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Anesthesia for thoracic surgery in infants and children.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the optimal ventilation mode during thoracoscopic repair (TR) of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), we compared high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV).
methodsTwenty-three neonatal CDH cases who underwent TR without intraoperative inhalation of nitric oxide at our institution between 2007 and 2016 were reviewed. Patients were initially ventilated with HFOV, which was converted to CMV if the HFOV settings were decreased to FiO
resultsSeventeen patients were ventilated with HFOV (group I), and six patients were ventilated with CMV (group II). Preoperative PaCO
conclusionsHFOV seems to prevent deterioration of hypercapnia and acidosis to a greater extent than CMV during TR in neonatal cases of CDH, although patients can also be ventilated with CMV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.