Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28803271›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2018

Brain biopsies requiring Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease precautions in the Republic of Ireland 2005-2016.

F M Brett, S Looby, A Chalissery, D Chen, C Heaney, J Heffernan, F Cunningham, R Howley, T Loftus, H Kearney and 1 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Neuropathology correlates of cognitive assessments.Irish journal of medical science · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F M BrettDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland. francescabrett@rcsi.ie.
S LoobyDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
A ChalisseryDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
D ChenDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
C HeaneyDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
J HeffernanDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
F CunninghamDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
R HowleyDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
T LoftusDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
H KearneyDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
M A FarrellDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCreutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) risk precautions are required when performing brain biopsies on patients with a dementing illness and in 'risk' groups. The impact on a diagnostic neuropathology service is considerable. We sought to determine if better case selection might reduce the necessity for application of CJD risk precautions.

methodsWe reviewed the clinical information, contributory investigations and final neuropathologic diagnosis in a cohort of patients (n = 21), referred to the National CJD Surveillance Centre between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016.

resultsOf this 21-patient cohort, five were positive for CJD, four belonged to the 'at risk of CJD' category requiring brain surgery, while the remaining 12 were referred to the National CJD Surveillance Unit with CJD as part of their differential diagnosis. CJD was confirmed in 5/21 (three sporadic [s]CJD, one variant [v]CJD and one iatrogenic [i] CJD). CJD was clinically probable in 4/5 proven CJD patients (80%). The patients (n = 4) in the 'at risk of CJD' group were diagnosed with tumour (n = 2), inflammation (n = 1) and non-specific changes (n = 1). Of the remaining 12 patients (in whom CJD was included in the differential diagnosis), the final neuropathologic diagnoses included tumour (n = 2), neurodegenerative (n = 2), inflammatory (n = 1), metabolic (n = 2), vascular (n = 2) and non-specific gliosis (n = 3).

conclusionsMore often than not, the clinical suspicion of CJD was not borne out by the final neuropathological diagnosis. Failure by clinicians to adhere to the recommended CJD investigation algorithm impacts adversely on the neuropathology workload and causes unnecessary concern among operating theatre, laboratory and nursing personnel.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsyBrainCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeFemaleHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAD Alzheimer’s diseaseCJD Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseaseFTD Frontotemporal dementiaND Neurodegenerative disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.