Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28803198›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2018

Variability of indoor fungal microbiome of green and non-green low-income homes in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Kanistha Coombs, Diana Taft, Doyle V Ward, Brett J Green, Ginger L Chew, Behrouz Shamsaei, Jaroslaw Meller, Reshmi Indugula, Tiina Reponen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Type 2-high asthma is associated with a specific indoor mycobiome and microbiome.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kanistha CoombsUniversity of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Diana TaftUniversity of California at Davis, Department of Food Science and Technology, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA, USA.
Doyle V WardUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Center for Microbiome Research, 55 N Lake Ave, Worcester, MA, USA; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, 55 N Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA, USA.
Brett J GreenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Health Effects Laboratory Division, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ginger L ChewCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Branch, 4770 Buford Hwy, N.E., MS-F60 Atlanta, GA, USA.
Behrouz ShamsaeiUniversity of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jaroslaw MellerUniversity of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Division of Biomedical Informatics, 3333 Burnett Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Reshmi IndugulaUniversity of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tiina ReponenUniversity of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: Tiina.Reponen@uc.edu.

Funding

University of Cincinnati Education and Research CenterT42OH008432 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI DAVIS, KERMIT G. · 2005 to 2025
$32.7M
ACL HHS T42OH008432NCEH CDC HHS U01 EH000990NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Green" housing is designed to use low-impact materials, increase energy efficiency and improve occupant health. However, little is known about the indoor mycobiome of green homes. The current study is a subset of a multicenter study that aims to investigate the indoor environment of green homes and the respiratory health of asthmatic children. In the current study, the mycobiome in air, bed dust and floor dust was compared between green (study site) and non-green (control site), low-income homes in Cincinnati, Ohio. The samples were collected at baseline (within four months following renovation), and 12months after the baseline at the study site. Parallel sample collection was conducted in non-green control homes. Air samples were collected by PM2.5 samplers over 5-days. Bed and floor dust samples were vacuumed after the air sampling was completed. The DNA sample extracts were analyzed using ITS amplicon sequencing. Analysis indicated that there was no clear trend in the fungal communities between green and non-green homes. Instead, fungal community differences were greatest between sample types - air, bed, and floor. Microbial communities also changed substantially between sampling intervals in both green and non-green homes for all sample types, potentially indicating that there was very little stability in the mycobiomes. Research gaps remain regarding how indoor mycobiome fluctuates over time. Longer follow-up periods might elucidate the effect of green renovation on microbial load in buildings.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyEnvironmental MonitoringHousingMycobiomeAir Pollution, IndoorDustHumansIncomeOhioPoverty AreasDustAir samplingDust samplingMycobiomeOccupancySequencing

Identifiers

PMID28803198
PMCPMC6728913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.