Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28802831›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2017

Validation of a Targeted RNA Sequencing Assay for Kinase Fusion Detection in Solid Tumors.

Julie W Reeser, Dorrelyn Martin, Jharna Miya, Esko A Kautto, Ezra Lyon, Eliot Zhu, Michele R Wing, Amy Smith, Matthew Reeder, Eric Samorodnitsky and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Olfactomedin 4 in cancer development and progression.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Agnostic Biomarkers in Molecular Pathology.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathologica · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. NTRK insights: best practices for pathologists.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Engineering chromosome rearrangements in cancer.Disease models & mechanisms · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julie W ReeserComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Dorrelyn MartinComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Jharna MiyaComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Esko A KauttoComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Ezra LyonComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Eliot ZhuComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Michele R WingComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Amy SmithComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Matthew ReederComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Eric SamorodnitskyComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Hannah ParksComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Karan R NaikComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Joseph GozgitAriad Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nicholas NowackiDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Kurtis D DaviesDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
Marileila Varella-GarciaDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
Lianbo YuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Aharon G FreudDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Joshua ColemanDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Dara L AisnerDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
Sameek RoychowdhuryComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: sameek.roychowdhury@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USAriadne Diagnostics (United States) · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Sequencing, Analysis, and Interpretation of SequencingUM1HG006508 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PIENTA, KENNETH J., ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2013 to 2016
$7.8M
Assay Validation of Targeted RNA sequencing to Detect Kinase Gene FusionsUH3CA202971 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROYCHOWDHURY, SAMEEK · 2018 to 2020
$976k
Assay Validation of Targeted RNA sequencing to Detect Kinase Gene FusionsUH2CA202971 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROYCHOWDHURY, SAMEEK · 2016 to 2016
$352k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS UH2 CA202971NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA202971NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG006508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinase gene fusions are important drivers of oncogenic transformation and can be inhibited with targeted therapies. Clinical grade diagnostics using RNA sequencing to detect gene rearrangements in solid tumors are limited, and the few that are available require prior knowledge of fusion break points. To address this, we have analytically validated a targeted RNA sequencing assay (OSU-SpARKFuse) for fusion detection that interrogates complete transcripts from 93 kinase and transcription factor genes. From a total of 74 positive and 36 negative control samples, OSU-SpARKFuse had 93.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity for fusion detection. Assessment of repeatability and reproducibility revealed 96.3% and 94.4% concordance between intrarun and interrun technical replicates, respectively. Application of this assay on prospective patient samples uncovered OLFM4 as a novel RET fusion partner in a small-bowel cancer and led to the discovery of a KLK2-FGFR2 fusion in a patient with prostate cancer who subsequently underwent treatment with a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor. Beyond fusion detection, OSU-SpARKFuse has built-in capabilities for discovery research, including gene expression analysis, detection of single-nucleotide variants, and identification of alternative splicing events.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAlternative SplicingCell Line, TumorGene Expression ProfilingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasmsOncogene Proteins, FusionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retQuality ControlReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2Reproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorFGFR2 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2RET protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28802831
PMCPMC5975628
OpenAlexW2744611525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.