SynthesisThe Lancet. Oncology2017
Nodal stage migration and prognosis in anal cancer: a systematic review, meta-regression, and simulation study.
Synthesis in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Practice Guideline: Anal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-upDeutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Guideline
- The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Lymph Node Metastasis of FIGO Stage IB1-IIB Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Anal Carcinoma, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018Guideline
- Systematic review of outcome measures following chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer (CORMAC).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2018Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in anal cancer - is there a role in the future?ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Liver Metastasectomy in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Mayo Clinic Experience.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Tailored minimum examined lymph node threshold for colon cancer from large multi database analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review Defining Early Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Identifying Treatment.Cancers · 2025Review
- Evaluation of LNR and modified N stage systems for prognostic stratification of metastatic lymph nodes in stage III colorectal Cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- HPV-Related Cancers in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Comprehensive Review.Acta medica academica · 2024Review
- Pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging in anal cancer: large-scale evaluation of mrT, mrN and novel staging parameters.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Prognostic significance of an innovative staging system based on the logarithmic odds of positive lymph nodes for resectable gastroesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a population-based study with external validation of data.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison between pelvic MRI, CT, and PET/CT in baseline staging and radiation planning of anal squamous cell carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- MRI morphological characteristics of lymph nodes in anal squamous cell carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Review
- Imaging of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Survey Results and Expert Opinion from the Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Anal Cancer: The Past, Present and Future.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Article
- Speculation on optimal numbers of examined lymph node for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer from the perspective of stage migration.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Case Report: Resolution of high grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesion with antibiotics proposes a new role for syphilitic infection in potentiation of HPV-associated ASCC.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), lymph node positivity (LNP) indicates poor prognosis for survival and is central to radiotherapy planning. Over the past three decades, LNP proportion has increased, mainly reflecting enhanced detection with newer imaging modalities; a process known as nodal stage migration. If accompanied by constant T stage distributions, prognosis for both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative groups may improve without any increase in overall survival for individual patients; a paradox termed the Will Rogers phenomenon. Here, we aim to systematically evaluate the impact of nodal stage migration on survival in SCCA and address a novel hypothesis that this phenomenon results in reduced prognostic discrimination.
methodsWe did a systematic review and meta-regression to quantify changes in LNP over time and the impact of this change on survival and prognostic discrimination. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomised trials and observational studies in patients with SCCA published between Jan 1, 1970, and Oct 11, 2016. Studies were eligible if patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy as the main treatment, reported LNP proportions (all studies), and reported overall survival (not necessarily present in all studies). We excluded studies with fewer than 50 patients. We extracted study-level data with a standardised, piloted form. The primary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival. To investigate scenarios in which reduced prognostic discrimination might occur, we simulated varying true LNP proportions and true overall survival, and compared these with expected observed outcomes for varying levels of misclassification of true nodal state.
findingsWe identified 62 studies reporting LNP proportions, which included 10 569 patients. From these, we included 45 studies (6302 patients) with whole cohort 5-year overall survival, 11 studies with 5-year survival stratified by nodal status, and 20 studies with hazard ratios in our analyses of temporal changes. In 62 studies, the LNP proportions increased from a mean estimate of 15·3% (95% CI 10·5-20·1) in 1980 to 37·1% (34·0-41·3) in 2012 (p<0·0001). In 11 studies with prognostic data, increasing LNP was associated with improved overall survival in both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative categories, whereas the proportions with combined tumour stage T3 and T4 remained constant. In 20 studies, across a range of LNP proportions from 15% to 40%, the hazard ratios for overall survival of lymph node-positive versus lymph node-negative patients decreased significantly from 2·5 (95% CI 1·8-3·3) at 15% LNP to 1·3 (1·2-1·9; p=0·014) at 40% LNP. The simulated scenarios reproduced this effect if the true LNP proportions were 20% or 25%, but not if the true LNP proportions were 30% or greater.
interpretationWe describe a consequence of staging misclassification in anal cancer that we have termed reduced prognostic discrimination. We used this new observation to infer that the LNP proportions of more than 30% seen in modern clinical series (11 out of 15 studies with a median year since 2007) are higher than the true LNP proportion. The introduction of new staging technologies in oncology might misclassify true disease stage, spuriously informing disease management and ultimately increasing the risk of overtreatment.
fundingBowel Disease Research Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28802802What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.