Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28802770›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2017

Efficacy of navigation may be influenced by retrosplenial cortex-mediated learning of landmark stability.

Stephen D Auger, Peter Zeidman, Eleanor A Maguire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early development of navigationally relevant location information in the retrosplenial complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding forThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cholinergic modulation of spatial learning, memory and navigation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Retrosplenial Cortex Indexes Stability beyond the Spatial Domain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition.Brain and neuroscience advances · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen D AugerWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Peter ZeidmanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Eleanor A MaguireWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: e.maguire@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300117Medical Research Council G1002276Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human beings differ considerably in their ability to orient and navigate within the environment, but it has been difficult to determine specific causes of these individual differences. Permanent, stable landmarks are thought to be crucial for building a mental representation of an environment. Poor, compared to good, navigators have been shown to have difficulty identifying permanent landmarks, with a concomitant reduction in functional MRI (fMRI) activity in the retrosplenial cortex. However, a clear association between navigation ability and the learning of permanent landmarks has not been established. Here we tested for such a link. We had participants learn a virtual reality environment by repeatedly moving through it during fMRI scanning. The environment contained landmarks of which participants had no prior experience, some of which remained fixed in their locations while others changed position each time they were seen. After the fMRI learning phase, we divided participants into good and poor navigators based on their ability to find their way in the environment. The groups were closely matched on a range of cognitive and structural brain measures. Examination of the learning phase during scanning revealed that, while good and poor navigators learned to recognise the environment's landmarks at a similar rate, poor navigators were impaired at registering whether landmarks were stable or transient, and this was associated with reduced engagement of the retrosplenial cortex. Moreover, a mediation analysis showed that there was a significant effect of landmark permanence learning on navigation performance mediated through retrosplenial cortex activity. We conclude that a diminished ability to process landmark permanence may be a contributory factor to sub-optimal navigation, and could be related to the level of retrosplenial cortex engagement.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenSpace PerceptionSpatial LearningSpatial NavigationUser-Computer InterfaceYoung AdultOxygenFMRIHumanLandmarksNavigationPermanenceRetrosplenialVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID28802770
PMCPMC5637158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.