ArticleNeuropsychologia2017
Efficacy of navigation may be influenced by retrosplenial cortex-mediated learning of landmark stability.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early development of navigationally relevant location information in the retrosplenial complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Validation and comparison of virtual reality and 3D mobile games for cognitive assessment against ACE-III in 82 young participants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding forThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- The art gallery maze: a novel tool to assess human navigational abilities.Cognitive processing · 2021Article
- Peering into the Brain through the Retrosplenial Cortex to Assess Cognitive Function of the Injured Brain.Neurotrauma reports · 2021Article
- Behavior-dependent directional tuning in the human visual-navigation network.Nature communications · 2020Article
- The head direction cell network: attractor dynamics, integration within the navigation system, and three-dimensional properties.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020Review
- Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions?Cognition · 2020Article
- Self-reported navigation ability is associated with optic flow-sensitive regions' functional connectivity patterns during visual path integration.Brain and behavior · 2019Article
- The retrosplenial-parietal network and reference frame coordination for spatial navigation.Behavioral neuroscience · 2018Review
- Cholinergic modulation of spatial learning, memory and navigation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Review
- Network supporting contextual fear learning after dorsal hippocampal damage has increased dependence on retrosplenial cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Dissociating Landmark Stability from Orienting Value Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2018Article
- Retrosplenial Cortex Indexes Stability beyond the Spatial Domain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition.Brain and neuroscience advances · 2018Review
- Navigation performance in virtual reality-based cognitive assessment games as a candidate digital cognitive marker of hippocampal vulnerability: a scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human beings differ considerably in their ability to orient and navigate within the environment, but it has been difficult to determine specific causes of these individual differences. Permanent, stable landmarks are thought to be crucial for building a mental representation of an environment. Poor, compared to good, navigators have been shown to have difficulty identifying permanent landmarks, with a concomitant reduction in functional MRI (fMRI) activity in the retrosplenial cortex. However, a clear association between navigation ability and the learning of permanent landmarks has not been established. Here we tested for such a link. We had participants learn a virtual reality environment by repeatedly moving through it during fMRI scanning. The environment contained landmarks of which participants had no prior experience, some of which remained fixed in their locations while others changed position each time they were seen. After the fMRI learning phase, we divided participants into good and poor navigators based on their ability to find their way in the environment. The groups were closely matched on a range of cognitive and structural brain measures. Examination of the learning phase during scanning revealed that, while good and poor navigators learned to recognise the environment's landmarks at a similar rate, poor navigators were impaired at registering whether landmarks were stable or transient, and this was associated with reduced engagement of the retrosplenial cortex. Moreover, a mediation analysis showed that there was a significant effect of landmark permanence learning on navigation performance mediated through retrosplenial cortex activity. We conclude that a diminished ability to process landmark permanence may be a contributory factor to sub-optimal navigation, and could be related to the level of retrosplenial cortex engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.