ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2017
Elucidating virus entry using a tetracysteine-tagged virus.
Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Making Rift Valley Fever Viral Particles Fluorescent.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- ISG20 inhibits bluetongue virus replication.Virologica Sinica · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescent tags constitute an invaluable tool in facilitating a deeper understanding of the mechanistic processes governing virus-host interactions. However, when selecting a fluorescent tag for in vivo imaging of cells, a number of parameters and aspects must be considered. These include whether the tag may affect and interfere with protein conformation or localization, cell toxicity, spectral overlap, photo-stability and background. Cumulatively, these constitute challenges to be overcome. Bluetongue virus (BTV), a member of the Orbivirus genus in the Reoviridae family, is a non-enveloped virus that is comprised of two architecturally complex capsids. The outer capsid, composed of two proteins, VP2 and VP5, together facilitate BTV attachment, entry and the delivery of the transcriptionally active core in the cell cytoplasm. Previously, the significance of the endocytic pathway for BTV entry was reported, although a detailed analysis of the role of each protein during virus trafficking remained elusive due to the unavailability of a tagged virus. Described here is the successful modification, and validation, of a segmented genome belonging to a complex and large capsid virus to introduce tags for fluorescence visualization. The data generated from this approach highlighted the sequential dissociation of VP2 and VP5, driven by decreasing pH during the transition from early to late endosomes, and their retention therein as the virus particles progress along the endocytic pathway. Furthermore, the described tagging technology and methodology may prove transferable and allow for the labeling of other non-enveloped complex viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.