Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28802714›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2017

In silico structure-based approaches to discover protein-protein interaction-targeting drugs.

Woong-Hee Shin, Charles W Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Recent Deep Learning Applications to Structure-Based Drug Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.Artificial intelligence review · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Woong-Hee ShinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Charles W ChristofferDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: dkihara@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Structural Modeling of Multifarious Protein ComplexesR01GM123055 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
Identification of protein-metabolite interactome.R01GM097528 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097528NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A core concept behind modern drug discovery is finding a small molecule that modulates a function of a target protein. This concept has been successfully applied since the mid-1970s. However, the efficiency of drug discovery is decreasing because the druggable target space in the human proteome is limited. Recently, protein-protein interaction (PPI) has been identified asan emerging target space for drug discovery. PPI plays a pivotal role in biological pathways including diseases. Current human interactome research suggests that the number of PPIs is between 130,000 and 650,000, and only a small number of them have been targeted as drug targets. For traditional drug targets, in silico structure-based methods have been successful in many cases. However, their performance suffers on PPI interfaces because PPI interfaces are different in five major aspects: From a geometric standpoint, they have relatively large interface regions, flat geometry, and the interface surface shape tends to fluctuate upon binding. Also, their interactions are dominated by hydrophobic atoms, which is different from traditional binding-pocket-targeted drugs. Finally, PPI targets usually lack natural molecules that bind to the target PPI interface. Here, we first summarize characteristics of PPI interfaces and their known binders. Then, we will review existing in silico structure-based approaches for discovering small molecules that bind to PPI interfaces.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Docking SimulationComputational BiologyDrug DiscoveryHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesStructure-Activity RelationshipProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesFragment-based drug discoveryHotspotPPI drugProtein-ligand dockingProtein-protein interactionVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID28802714
PMCPMC5683929
OpenAlexW2745208859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.