ArticleDiabetes research and clinical practice2017
Salivary extracellular RNA biomarkers for insulin resistance detection in hispanics.
Article in Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid Biopsy: A Game Changer for Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Integrative analysis of multi-omics data to detect the underlying molecular mechanisms for obesity in vivo in humans.Human genomics · 2022Article
- A Circulating Exosome RNA Signature Is a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Pancreatic Cancer, a Systematic Study.Cancers · 2021Article
- Identification of Salivary Proteomic Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Screening.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Serum Irisin: A Potential Diagnostic Marker for Insulin Resistance in Acne Vulgaris.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsInsulin resistance (IR) detection is challenging and no test is currently used in clinical practice. We developed salivary biomarkers that could be used for IR detection.
methodsWe collected saliva from 186 healthy and 276 pre-diabetic participants, divided them into high and low IR groups based on a HOMA cutoff of 2.5. We profiled extracellular transcriptome by microarray in saliva supernatant from 23 high IR and 15 low IR participants, and pre-validated the top ten extracellular mRNA (exRNA) markers in a new cohort of 40 high and 40 low IR participants. A prediction panel was then built and validated in an independent cohort of 149 high and 195 low IR participants.
resultsTranscriptomic analyses identified 42 exRNA candidates differentially present in saliva of high and low IR participants. From the top ten candidates, six were individually validated (PRKCB, S100A12, IL1R2, CAMP, VPS4B, CAP1) (p<0.01) and yielded AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.76. Body mass index (BMI) was significant higher in high compared to low IR group with AUC of 0.66, and showed no correlation with any of candidate biomarkers. The combination of four exRNA markers (IL1R2, VPS4B, CAP1, LUZP6) with BMI achieved excellent results in the prediction panel building dataset (AUC=0.79, sensitivity=79%, specificity=64%). The prediction model was validated in an independent cohort (AUC=0.82, sensitivity=63%, specificity=92%).
conclusionsA panel of four salivary exRNA biomarkers (IL1R2, VPS4B, CAP1, LUZP6) and BMI was validated that can distinguish high and low IR participants, overall and in subgroups of healthy and pre-diabetic participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.