Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28802338›Full record

ReviewClinics in perinatology2017

Context in Quality of Care: Improving Teamwork and Resilience.

Daniel S Tawfik, John Bryan Sexton, Kathryn C Adair, Heather C Kaplan, Jochen Profit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interprofessional Perspectives on Communication Quality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Teamwork and burnout among healthcare workers from a public hospital in ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Changing safety culture.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel S TawfikDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 770 Welch Road, Suite 435, Stanford, CA 94304, USA; Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, 725 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Electronic address: dtawfik@stanford.edu.
John Bryan SextonDepartment of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Health System, 2213 Elba Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke Patient Safety Center, Duke University Health System, 2213 Elba Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Kathryn C AdairDepartment of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Health System, 2213 Elba Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke Patient Safety Center, Duke University Health System, 2213 Elba Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Heather C KaplanDepartment of Pediatrics, Perinatal Institute, James M. Anderson Centre for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7009, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Jochen ProfitLucile Packard Children's Hospital, 725 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Neonatology, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1265 Welch Road, MSOB, MC: 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, 1265 Welch Road, MSOB, MC: 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

The WISER StudyR01HD084679 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN, SEXTON, JOHN BRYAN · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality improvement in health care is an ongoing challenge. Consideration of the context of the health care system is of paramount importance. Staff resilience and teamwork climate are key aspects of context that drive quality. Teamwork climate is dynamic, with well-established tools available to improve teamwork for specific tasks or global applications. Similarly, burnout and resilience can be modified with interventions such as cultivating gratitude, positivity, and awe. A growing body of literature has shown that teamwork and burnout relate to quality of care, with improved teamwork and decreased burnout expected to produce improved patient quality and safety.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCooperative BehaviorPatient Care TeamQuality of Health CareResilience, PsychologicalHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalBurnoutQualityResilienceSafety climateTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID28802338
PMCPMC5644508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.