Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28802204›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2017

Humanized mouse models to study human cell-mediated and humoral responses to dengue virus.

Anuja Mathew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anuja MathewInstitute for Immunology and Informatics, University of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: mathewa@uri.edu.

Funding

Targeting Dendritic Cells for Enhanced Musocal ImmunityU19AI057234 · NIAID · BAYLOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BANCHEREAU, JACQUES F · 2003 to 2013
$49.2M
Technologies for Human Cellular ImmunologyU19AI057319 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LIBRATY, DANIEL H. · 2003 to 2013
$34.4M
Human Monoclonals to Dengue VirusR21AI103650 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MATHEW, ANUJA · 2013 to 2014
$440k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI103650NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057234NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several candidate dengue virus vaccines are in clinical trials and show promise as an effective measure to control dengue. However, it is becoming clear that additional vaccine candidates may be needed as there is concern about the durability of the immune response to all four serotypes of vaccine components and efficacy varies dependent on the immune status of the individual. The lack of an appropriate animal model to mimic human dengue has deterred the development of vaccines and anti-viral therapies to dengue virus. The focus of this review is to discuss advances in the development of humanized animal models and to highlight how they could be used for antiviral and dengue vaccine testing if limitations with cell-mediated immunity and seroconversion to IgG are overcome.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralAnimalsAntibodies, ViralB-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDengueDengue VirusHumansMiceMice, TransgenicViral ProteinsAntibodies, ViralViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28802204
PMCPMC5769147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.