Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28801865›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Faecal lactoferrin and calprotectin in patients with Clostridium difficile infection: a case-control study.

F Barbut, C Gouot, N Lapidus, L Suzon, R Syed-Zaidi, V Lalande, C Eckert

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04491799 (Fecal Calprotectin Level in Differentiating Between Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Diarrhea in Patients With Nosocomial Diarrhea), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04491799 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Fecal Calprotectin Level in Differentiating Between Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Diarrhea in Patients With Nosocomial Diarrhea

TypeobservationalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled135ConditionsDiarrhea, CalprotectinArmsFecal calprotectin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The value of fecal calprotectin inFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Clostridioides difficile Near-Patient Testing Versus Centralized Testing: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Biomarkers for Early Severity Prediction inMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Diagnosis ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Predictive value of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin levels for negative outcomes in Clostridioides difficile infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Diagnostic Guidance for C. difficile Infections.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stool Interleukin-1β Differentiates Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) From Asymptomatic Carriage and Non-CDI Diarrhea.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Microbiome profile and calprotectin levels as markers of risk of recurrentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

F BarbutNational Reference Laboratory for Clostridium difficile, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, 75012, Paris, France. frederic.barbut@aphp.fr.
C GouotUnité d'Hygiène et de Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
N LapidusSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), 75012, Paris, France.
L SuzonNational Reference Laboratory for Clostridium difficile, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, 75012, Paris, France.
R Syed-ZaidiNational Reference Laboratory for Clostridium difficile, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, 75012, Paris, France.
V LalandeUPMC Univ Paris 06, GRC n°2, Epidiff, Paris, France.
C EckertNational Reference Laboratory for Clostridium difficile, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, 75012, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Saint-Antoine · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Astellas Pharma Europe AS 25 RG 14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calprotectin and lactoferrin are released by the gastrointestinal tract in response to infection and mucosal inflammation. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of quantifying faecal lactoferrin and calprotectin concentrations in Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) patients with or without free toxins in the stools. We conducted a single-centre 22-month case-control study. Patients with a positive CDI diagnosis were compared to two control groups: group 1 = diarrhoeic patients negative for C. difficile and matched (1:1) to CDI cases on the ward location and age, and group 2 = diarrhoeic patients colonised with a non-toxigenic strain of C. difficile. Faecal lactoferrin and calprotectin concentrations in faeces were determined for patients with CDI and controls. Of 135 patients with CDI, 87 (64.4%) had a positive stool cytotoxicity assay (free toxin) and 48 (35.6%) had a positive toxigenic culture without detectable toxins in the stools. The median lactoferrin values were 26.8 μg/g, 8.0 μg/g and 15.8 μg/g in CDI patients and groups 1 and 2, respectively. The median calprotectin values were 218.0 μg/g, 111.5 μg/g and 111.3 μg/g, respectively. Among patients with CDI, faecal lactoferrin and calprotectin levels were higher in those with free toxins in their stools (39.2 vs. 10.2 μg/g, p = 0.003 and 274.0 vs. 166.0 μg/g, p = 0.051, respectively). Both faecal calprotectin and lactoferrin were higher in patients with CDI, especially in those with detectable toxin in faeces, suggesting a correlation between intestinal inflammation and toxins in stools.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileLactoferrinLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexAgedCase-Control StudiesClostridium InfectionsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveLactoferrinLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complex

Identifiers

PMID28801865
OpenAlexW2742508720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.