ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017
Surgery is essential in squamous cell cancer of the rectum.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical implications of squamous cell carcinoma in the colon and rectum: A comprehensive analysis from the National Cancer Database.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Treatment paradigm and prognostic factor analyses of rectal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A systematic and comprehensive analysis of colorectal squamous cell carcinoma: Implication for diagnosis and treatment.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum.BMJ case reports · 2020Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSquamous cell cancer (SCC) is a rare histological subtype of rectal cancer. It is unclear whether SCC should be treated by multimodal therapy, including surgery, or by chemoradiation alone. The objective of the study was to define an optimal treatment strategy.
methodsPatients with rectal cancer and SCC histology were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database between 1990 and 2013. According to treatment, three groups were defined: radiotherapy and surgery (RT/SX), radiotherapy (RT), and surgery (SX). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) for localized, regional, and distant disease were assessed using a multivariable Cox regression model.
resultsOut of 856,435 colorectal cancer patients, 1747 with SCC of the rectum were eligible. Four hundred and fifty-five were treated with RT/SX, 994 with RT, and 298 with SX. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) did not differ for OS and DSS in localized disease. In regional disease, OS and DSS were improved for RT/SX compared to RT (HR 0.751, 95% CI 0.566-0.997, P = 0.048 and HR 0.679, 95% CI 0.478-0.966, P = 0.031). In distant disease, OS and DSS were not different.
conclusionsMultimodal therapy including surgery improved OS and DSS compared to receiving a treatment without surgery for regional disease in rectal SCC. No difference was observed in localized and distant disease. The findings contradict with recent reports favoring definitive chemoradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.