Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28801716›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017

[Plastic surgery reconstruction of the adult buried penis : Option or obligation?]

S Mühlstädt, P Anheuser, N Mohammed, A D Bach

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S MühlstädtUniversitätsklinik für Urologie und Nierentransplantation, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle/Saale, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle/Saale, Deutschland. sandra.muehlstaedt@uk-halle.de.
P AnheuserKlinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
N MohammedUniversitätsklinik für Urologie und Nierentransplantation, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle/Saale, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle/Saale, Deutschland.
A D BachKlinik für Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie - Handchirurgie - Wiederherstellungschirurgie, St. Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler, Aachen, Deutschland.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEAsklepios Klinik St. Georg · DESankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult buried penis afflicts the patient with shame and is also potentially associated with considerable urogenital complications. Due to obesity, chronic urogenital lymphedema or subsequent inflammatory urogenital conditions, such as a lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, the clinical appearance of the adult buried penis is extremely variable. Epidemiological data are non-existent. Therapeutically, a combination of various plastic surgery procedures is often necessary for the best esthetic and functional results. The therapeutic strategy is highly individual and the therapy itself is interdisciplinary. This article provides an overview of the plastic surgery reconstruction of the adult buried penis.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresAdultEstheticsHumansLymphedemaMaleMale Urogenital DiseasesObesity, MorbidPenile DiseasesPenisSurgical FlapsBuck’s fasciaLichen sclerosusLymphedema, chronicObesityUrogenital reconstruction, plastic surgical

Identifiers

PMID28801716
OpenAlexW2744950042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.