ArticleScientific reports2017
Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Sheet Enhances Allograft Repair in a Mouse Model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Masquelet Inspired in Vivo Engineered Extracellular Matrix as Functional Periosteum for Bone Defect Repair and Reconstruction.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Cell Sheet Technology as an Engineering-Based Approach to Bone Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Review
- Biomimetic three-layered membranes comprising (poly)-ε-caprolactone, collagen and mineralized collagen for guided bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- Transient activation of notch signaling enhances endogenous stromal cell expansion and subsequent bone defect repair.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021Article
- Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Wnt Signaling Inhibits High-Density Cell Sheet Culture Induced Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Aging by Targeting Cell Cycle Inhibitor p27.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine whether cell sheets generated with long-term passaged (P10) aging human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) could be used for bone tissue regeneration as tissue engineered periosteum in a femoral allograft mouse model similar to fresh passaged (P3) young MSCs. At 3 weeks after transplantation of MSC sheets, results showed more bony callus formed between allograft and host bone ends in both young P3 MSC and aged P10 MSC sheet-wrapped groups when compared to allograft alone. At 6 weeks, while both MSC sheet-wrapped allografts showed more bony callus formation when compared to allograft alone groups, the bony callus size in aged P10 MSC sheet groups was significantly less than young P3 MSC sheet groups. Biomechanical testing confirmed that P3 MSC sheet-grafted femurs had the highest biomechanical strength in the three groups. Histology sections showed that the area of the chondriod callus in the aged P10 MSC sheet groups was significantly larger than in P3 MSC sheet groups. Finally, a significant increase of chondro-osteoclast activity was observed in the P3 MSC sheet-grafted femur. Our data demonstrates that extensive long-term culture-induced MSC aging impaired their osteogenic ability and subsequent bony callus formation, and could be used to induce cartilaginous callus formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.