ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2017
Perceptions of asthma control in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study comparing patient and healthcare professionals' perceptions of asthma control with validated ACT scores.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and initial validation of the Asthma Severity Scoring System (ASSESS).The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020Trial
- The Adherence Paradox in Uncontrolled Moderate-To-Severe Asthma: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Unmet Needs.Research in nursing & health · 2026Article
- [Asthma Management and Control in Germany in Light of Current Guidelines].Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Concomitant Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Real-World Exploratory Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Asthma control and opportunities to optimize management and the healthcare provider experience using the AsthmaOptimiser online tool in Dutch general practice: the CAPTURE study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Observational
- Health system characteristics and evidence-based asthma care.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
- Asthma Control According to GINA 2023: Does Changing the Criteria Improve Asthma Control?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Psychometric properties and predictive validity of the PP-ACT.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2023Article
- Breaking the vicious circle-the Asthma Referral Identifier (ReferID) tool.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2022Review
- Patient perspectives of the influence of severe and non-severe asthma on their quality of life: A national survey of asthma patients in Spain.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Implementing asthma management guidelines in public primary care clinics in Malaysia.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2021Article
- Smartphone App for monitoring Asthma in children and adolescents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Harmonizing allergy care-integrated care pathways and multidisciplinary approaches.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2021Review
- Mixed methods process evaluation of my breathing matters, a digital intervention to support self-management of asthma.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2021Article
- Prevalence of modifiable factors limiting treatment efficacy of poorly controlled asthma patients: EFIMERA observational study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2020Observational
- A multinational observational study identifying primary care patients at risk of overestimation of asthma control.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2019Observational
- Perception of asthma control among asthmatics seen inChest Clinic at Tertiary Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perceptions of asthma control often vary between patients and physicians. This cross-sectional survey provided UK-specific data on actual and perceived asthma control in patients (18-75 years) attending routine asthma reviews in primary, secondary and tertiary settings. Differences between healthcare professionals' (HCP) and patients' perceptions of asthma control were evaluated via an online questionnaire and compared to a control-the validated asthma control test (ACT)-which patients completed. Treated patients (at least a short acting ß-agonist) with a documented diagnosis of asthma were enroled and consented within a month of their last appointment. Patients were grouped according to the British Thoracic Society (BTS)/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 2014 treatment guidelines (BTS/SIGN steps 1-5). A total of 260 patients were screened: 234 were eligible for enrolment: 33, 52, 50, 49 and 50 patients in steps 1-5, respectively. Seventy per cent (164) were women. The percentage of patients aged 45-64 years was 47.4%. HCPs classed 70% (164) as non-smokers. 84.2% of patients and 73.9% of HCPs perceived that asthma was controlled but ACT results suggest that asthma was only controlled in 54.7% of patients (ACT score ≥20). Patients in steps 4 and 5 had the highest levels of uncontrolled asthma. Correct agreement between ACT score with perceptions of controlled or uncontrolled asthma occurred in 67.9% of patients and 68.8% of HCPs; the poorest levels of agreement occurred in patients in steps 4 and 5. Uncontrolled asthma is common in UK patients. High proportions of patients and HCPs have incorrect perceptions of asthma control, especially in relation to patients with asthma in steps 4 and 5. ASTHMA: MISPERCEPTIONS OF CONTROL ABOUND AMONG UK PATIENTS AND DOCTORS: Asthma patients and their doctors often misperceive whether the disease is under control, according to a British study. Andrew Menzies-Gow from Royal Brompton Hospital in London and Gavin Chiu from Boehringer Ingelheim UK in Bracknell used an online questionnaire to assess perceptions of asthma control among 234 patients and their healthcare providers. All participants had at least intermittent asthma that required occasional treatment; many had more severe disease. The researchers found that 84% of patients and 74% of doctors thought the asthma was well controlled, but results of the Asthma Control Test indicated only 55% of patients objectively achieved disease control. Correct agreement between the validated test and more subjective perceptions occurred in only 68 % of patients and 69% of doctors. Addressing this mismatch could go a long way to improving asthma control among British patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.