Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28801617›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

G protein stoichiometry dictates biased agonism through distinct receptor-G protein partitioning.

Lauriane Onfroy, Ségolène Galandrin, Stéphanie M Pontier, Marie-Hélène Seguelas, Du N'Guyen, Jean-Michel Sénard, Céline Galés

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Endogenous Derivatives of Linoleic Acid and their Stable Analogs Are Potential Pain Mediators.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Agonist-Dependent Coupling of the Promiscuous Adenosine AACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Fusion with Promiscuous GαInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. E-cadherin-deficient cells have synthetic lethal vulnerabilities in plasma membrane organisation, dynamics and function.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Article
  16. Deciphering biased inverse agonism of cangrelor and ticagrelor at P2YCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Application of Nanoparticles for Targeting G Protein-Coupled Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauriane OnfroyInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1048, Université de Toulouse, F-31432, Toulouse, France.
Ségolène GalandrinInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1048, Université de Toulouse, F-31432, Toulouse, France.
Stéphanie M PontierIndependent Researcher Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marie-Hélène SeguelasInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1048, Université de Toulouse, F-31432, Toulouse, France.
Du N'GuyenInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1048, Université de Toulouse, F-31432, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Michel SénardInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1048, Université de Toulouse, F-31432, Toulouse, France.
Céline GalésInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1048, Université de Toulouse, F-31432, Toulouse, France. celine.gales@inserm.fr.
Inserm · FRInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires · FRUniversité de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biased agonism at G protein coupled receptors emerges as an opportunity for development of drugs with enhanced benefit/risk balance making biased ligand identification a priority. However, ligand biased signature, classically inferred from ligand activity across multiple pathways, displays high variability in recombinant systems. Functional assays usually necessity receptor/effector overexpression that should be controlled among assays to allow comparison but this calibration currently fails. Herein, we demonstrate that Gα expression level dictates the biased profiling of agonists and, to a lesser extent of β-blockers, in a Gα isoform- and receptor-specific way, depending on specific G protein activity in different membrane territories. These results have major therapeutic implications since they suggest that the ligand bias phenotype is not necessarily maintained in pathological cell background characterized by fluctuations in G protein expression. Thus, we recommend implementation of G protein stoichiometry as a new parameter in biased ligand screening programs.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsGene ExpressionGTP-Binding ProteinsHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsMiceMyocytes, CardiacProtein IsoformsProtein SubunitsReceptors, Adrenergic, betaReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsGTP-Binding ProteinsLigandsProtein IsoformsProtein SubunitsReceptors, Adrenergic, betaReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID28801617
PMCPMC5554226
OpenAlexW2742461357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.