Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28801423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychological interventions, and their combination for depressive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a network meta-analysis.

Xinyu Zhou, Andrea Cipriani, Yuqing Zhang, Pim Cuijpers, Sarah E Hetrick, John R Weisz, Juncai Pu, Cinzia Del Giovane, Toshiaki A Furukawa, Jürgen Barth and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xinyu ZhouDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Yuqing ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience and the Collaborative Innovation Centre for Brain Science,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sarah E HetrickOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, and the Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
John R WeiszDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Juncai PuDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience and the Collaborative Innovation Centre for Brain Science,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Cinzia Del GiovaneDepartment of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Toshiaki A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behaviour, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Jürgen BarthInstitute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine,UniversityHospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David CoghillDepartments of Paediatrics and Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Lining YangDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience and the Collaborative Innovation Centre for Brain Science,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Arun V RavindranDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Peng XieDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience and the Collaborative Innovation Centre for Brain Science,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepressive disorder is common in children and adolescents, with important consequences and serious impairments in terms of personal and social functioning. While both pharmacological and psychological interventions have been shown to be effective, there is still uncertainty about the balance between these and what treatment strategy should be preferred in clinical practice. Therefore, we aim to compare and rank in a network meta-analysis (NMA) the commonly used psychological, pharmacological and combined interventions for depressive disorder in children and adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will update the literature search of two previous NMAs for the identification of trials of antidepressant and psychotherapy alone for depressive disorder in children and adolescents. For identification of trials of combination interventions, seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LiLACS) will be searched from date of inception. We will also search ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and check relevant reports on the US Food and Drug Administration website for unpublished data. Building on our previous findings in the field, we will include any commonly prescribed oral antidepressants and any manualised or structured psychotherapies, as well as their combinations. Randomised controlled trials assessing any active intervention against active comparator or pill placebo/psychological controls in acute treatment for depressive disorder in children and adolescents will be included. The primary outcomes will be efficacy (mean change in depressive symptoms), and acceptability of treatment (dropout rate due to any cause). The secondary outcomes will be remission rate, tolerability of treatment (dropouts for adverse events), as well as suicide-related outcomes (suicidal behaviour or ideation). We will perform Bayesian NMAs for all relative outcome measures. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. DISSEMINATION: This NMA will provide the most up to date and clinically useful information about the comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychological intervention and their combination in the acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder. This is the newest NMA and therefore these results are very important in terms of evidence-based medicine. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015020841.

Indexed as

PsychotherapyAdolescentAntidepressive AgentsChildCombined Modality TherapyDepressionDepressive DisorderHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicPatient DropoutsResearch DesignSuicidal IdeationAntidepressive Agentsadolescentantidepressantchilddepressionnetwork metaDanalysispsychotherapysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28801423
PMCPMC5629731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.