Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28801396›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

The SIMS trial: adjustable anchored single-incision mini-slings versus standard tension-free midurethral slings in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. A study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, Graeme MacLennan, Mary Kilonzo, R Phil Assassa, Kirsty McCormick, Tracey Davidson, Alison McDonald, James N'Dow, Judith Wardle, John Norrie

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed Abdel-FattahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Graeme MacLennanHealth Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Mary KilonzoHealth Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
R Phil AssassaSpire Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Kirsty McCormickCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Tracey DavidsonCHRT, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Alison McDonaldCHRT, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
James N'DowChair in Surgery (Clinical), Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Judith WardlePatient Representative, London, UK.
John NorrieHealth Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBSpire Manchester Hospital · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HERU1Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Department of Health 12/127/157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSingle-incision mini-slings (SIMS) represent the third generation of midurethral slings. They have been developed with the aim of offering a true ambulatory procedure for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with reduced morbidity and earlier recovery while maintaining similar efficacy to standard midurethral slings (SMUS). The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of adjustable anchored SIMS compared with tension-free SMUS in the surgical management of female SUI, with 3-year follow-up. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure is the patient-reported success rate measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement at 12 months. The primary economic outcome will be incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 12 months. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The secondary outcomes measures include adverse events, objective success rates, impact on other lower urinary tract symptoms, health-related quality of life profile and sexual function, and reoperation rates for SUI. Secondary economic outcomes include National Health Service and patient primary and secondary care resource use and costs, incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental net benefit. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be by intention-to-treat and also a per-protocol analysis. Results will be displayed as estimates and 95% CIs. CIs around observed differences will then be compared with the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes will be analysed similarly. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee has approved this study (13/NS/0143). The dissemination plans include HTA monograph, presentation at international scientific meetings and publications in high-impact, open-access journals. The results will be included in the updates of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the European Association of Urology guidelines; these two specific guidelines directly influence practice in the UK and worldwide specialists, respectively. In addition, plain English-language summary of the main findings/results will be presented for relevant patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN93264234. The SIMS study is currently recruiting in 20 UK research centres. The first patient was randomised on 4 February 2014, with follow-up to be completed at the end of February 2020.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsAnesthesiaCoitusCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeReoperationRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomUrinary Incontinence, StressUrinationUrologic Surgical ProceduresMid-urethral slingsSingle Incision Slingsstress urinary IncontinenceTENSION-FREE VAGINAL TAPES

Identifiers

PMID28801396
PMCPMC5724064
OpenAlexW2742760407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.