Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28801246›Full record

ArticleMathematical biosciences2017

Time-optimal control strategies in SIR epidemic models.

Luca Bolzoni, Elena Bonacini, Cinzia Soresina, Maria Groppi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Fokker-Planck framework for control of epidemics.Journal of mathematical biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optimal control-based vaccination and testing strategies for COVID-19.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A new modelling of the COVID 19 pandemic.Chaos, solitons, and fractals · 2020
    Article
  18. Optimal quarantine control of an infectious outbreak.Chaos, solitons, and fractals · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca BolzoniRisk Analysis Unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Via dei Mercati 13, Parma 43126, Italy. Electronic address: luca.bolzoni@izsler.it.
Elena BonaciniDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 53/A, Parma 43124, Italy.
Cinzia SoresinaDepartment of Mathematics "F. Enriques", University of Milano, Via C. Saldini 50, Milano 20133, Italy.
Maria GroppiDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 53/A, Parma 43124, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the time-optimal control problem in SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered) epidemic models, focusing on different control policies: vaccination, isolation, culling, and reduction of transmission. Applying the Pontryagin's Minimum Principle (PMP) to the unconstrained control problems (i.e. without costs of control or resource limitations), we prove that, for all the policies investigated, only bang-bang controls with at most one switch are admitted. When a switch occurs, the optimal strategy is to delay the control action some amount of time and then apply the control at the maximum rate for the remainder of the outbreak. This result is in contrast with previous findings on the unconstrained problems of minimizing the total infectious burden over an outbreak, where the optimal strategy is to use the maximal control for the entire epidemic. Then, the critical consequence of our results is that, in a wide range of epidemiological circumstances, it may be impossible to minimize the total infectious burden while minimizing the epidemic duration, and vice versa. Moreover, numerical simulations highlighted additional unexpected results, showing that the optimal control can be delayed also when the control reproduction number is lower than one and that the switching time from no control to maximum control can even occur after the peak of infection has been reached. Our results are especially important for livestock diseases where the minimization of outbreaks duration is a priority due to sanitary restrictions imposed to farms during ongoing epidemics, such as animal movements and export bans.

Indexed as

Animal CullingAnimal DiseasesAnimalsEpidemicsHumansLivestockTime FactorsVaccinationBang–bang controlDelayed interventionDeterministic epidemicInfectious disease outbreakMinimum timeSIR model

Identifiers

PMID28801246
PMCPMC7094293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.