Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28801070›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2017

Methodological Considerations for the Temporal Summation of Second Pain.

Nathanial R Eckert, Charles J Vierck, Corey B Simon, Sachell Calderon, Yenisel Cruz-Almeida, Roland Staud, Roger B Fillingim, Joseph L Riley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nathanial R EckertDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: eckertnr@uindy.edu.
Charles J VierckCollege of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Corey B SimonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sachell CalderonCollege of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Yenisel Cruz-AlmeidaDepartment of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Roland StaudCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Roger B FillingimCollege of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Joseph L RileyCollege of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Florida College · USUniversity of Florida · USDuke University Hospital · USUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Karyn A Esser, Todd Manini · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
the Integrative and Multidisciplinary Pain and Aging Research Training (IMPART) ProgramT32AG049673 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FILLINGIM, ROGER B · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
The Effects of Aging on Experimental Models of Pain Inhibition and FacilitationR01AG039659 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RILEY, JOSEPH L · 2011 to 2016
$3.0M
Neuroimaging Age-Related Changes i Pain ModulationK01AG048259 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CRUZ-ALMEIDA, YENISEL · 2015 to 2019
$831k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG048259NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039659NIA NIH HHS T32 AG049673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal summation of second pain (TSSP) is a psychophysical indication of a central pain encoding mechanism, potentially enhanced in pathological pain conditions. Low-frequency repetitive stimulation of unmyelinated (C) nociceptors results in a progressive increase of pain intensity when thermal stimulation intensity remains constant. However, when using different methods of nociceptive delivery to the skin, regularity as well as rate of pain enhancement with repetition varies between experiments. Specifically, repetitive ramping up and down from a neutral to a painful temperature has produced weak and inconsistent pain summation. In contrast, repetitive contact of the skin with a preheated probe has generated substantial pain summation. In the present study, TSSP by the intermittent contact with a preheated thermode and constant contact, ramp and hold methods were compared during 10 iterations of stimulation of glabrous skin of the hand or hairy forearm skin, with an onset to onset interval of 3.3 seconds and stimulus interval of .8 seconds. Significantly greater TSSP was observed for intermittent contact stimulation at both sites (P < .001). Differential activation of myelinated and unmyelinated nociceptors by ramping and tapping may account for different rates of temporal summation of heat pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents direct evidence suggesting the constant contact, ramp and hold stimulus may underestimate the level of TSSP. This evidence suggests the re-evaluation of stimulation techniques used for temporal summation tests, especially within clinical models.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNociceptionNociceptive PainPain MeasurementPhysical StimulationSkinYoung Adultconstant contactintermittent contactpainsecond painTemporal summation

Identifiers

PMID28801070
PMCPMC5682202
OpenAlexW2744048956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.