Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800931›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2017

Molecular signatures of longevity: Insights from cross-species comparative studies.

Siming Ma, Vadim N Gladyshev

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A whale of a tale: whale cells evade the driving mechanism for hexavalent chromium-induced chromosome instability.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siming MaDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.
Vadim N GladyshevDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Laboratory of Systems Biology of Aging, Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia. Electronic address: vgladyshev@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

The role of hyaluronan in longevity and cancer resistance of longest-lived rodentP01AG047200 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Vera Gorbunova · 2014 to 2026
$36.9M
Methionine sulfoxide reduction, selenium and agingR01AG021518 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI GLADYSHEV, VADIM N. · 2003 to 2018
$5.0M
Mechanisms of lifespan controlDP1AG047745 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GLADYSHEV, VADIM N. · 2013 to 2018
$4.4M
Understanding the Causes of AgingR01AG038004 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GLADYSHEV, VADIM N. · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS DP1 AG047745NIA NIH HHS P01 AG047200NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021518NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the current research on longevity focuses on the aging process within a single species. Several molecular players (e.g. IGF1 and MTOR), pharmacological compounds (e.g. rapamycin and metformin), and dietary approaches (e.g. calorie restriction and methionine restriction) have been shown to be important in regulating and modestly extending lifespan in model organisms. On the other hand, natural lifespan varies much more significantly across species. Within mammals alone, maximum lifespan differs more than 100 fold, but the underlying regulatory mechanisms remain poorly understood. Recent comparative studies are beginning to shed light on the molecular signatures associated with exceptional longevity. These include genome sequencing of microbats, naked mole rat, blind mole rat, bowhead whale and African turquoise killifish, and comparative analyses of gene expression, metabolites, lipids and ions across multiple mammalian species. Together, they point towards several putative strategies for lifespan regulation and cancer resistance, as well as the pathways and metabolites associated with longevity variation. In particular, longevity may be achieved by both lineage-specific adaptations and common mechanisms that apply across the species. Comparing the resulting cross-species molecular signatures with the within-species lifespan extension strategies will improve our understanding of mechanisms of longevity control and provide a starting point for novel and effective interventions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomeMetabolomeTranscriptomeAnimalsBowhead WhaleCaloric RestrictionChiropteraHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IKillifishesLongevityMetforminMethionineMole RatsSirolimusInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMetforminMethionineSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID28800931
PMCPMC5807068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.