Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800781›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

Knowledge-guided gene prioritization reveals new insights into the mechanisms of chemoresistance.

Amin Emad, Junmei Cairns, Krishna R Kalari, Liewei Wang, Saurabh Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genetic markers in methotrexate treatments.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amin EmadCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0846-4275
Junmei CairnsDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Gonda 19, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200, 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Krishna R KalariDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Liewei WangDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Gonda 19, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200, 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Wang.Liewei@mayo.edu.
Saurabh SinhaDepartment of Computer Science and Institute of Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2122 Siebel Center, 201N. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. sinhas@illinois.edu.

Funding

TRAININGU54GM114838 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HAN, JIAWEI, SINHA, SAURABH · 2014 to 2017
$10.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of genes whose basal mRNA expression predicts the sensitivity of tumor cells to cytotoxic treatments can play an important role in individualized cancer medicine. It enables detailed characterization of the mechanism of action of drugs. Furthermore, screening the expression of these genes in the tumor tissue may suggest the best course of chemotherapy or a combination of drugs to overcome drug resistance.

resultsWe developed a computational method called ProGENI to identify genes most associated with the variation of drug response across different individuals, based on gene expression data. In contrast to existing methods, ProGENI also utilizes prior knowledge of protein-protein and genetic interactions, using random walk techniques. Analysis of two relatively new and large datasets including gene expression data on hundreds of cell lines and their cytotoxic responses to a large compendium of drugs reveals a significant improvement in prediction of drug sensitivity using genes identified by ProGENI compared to other methods. Our siRNA knockdown experiments on ProGENI-identified genes confirmed the role of many new genes in sensitivity to three chemotherapy drugs: cisplatin, docetaxel, and doxorubicin. Based on such experiments and extensive literature survey, we demonstrate that about 73% of our top predicted genes modulate drug response in selected cancer cell lines. In addition, global analysis of genes associated with groups of drugs uncovered pathways of cytotoxic response shared by each group.

conclusionsOur results suggest that knowledge-guided prioritization of genes using ProGENI gives new insight into mechanisms of drug resistance and identifies genes that may be targeted to overcome this phenomenon.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpistasis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Association StudiesHumansPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorChemoresistanceChemotherapyDrug sensitivityGene interaction networkGene prioritizationNetwork-based algorithm

Identifiers

PMID28800781
PMCPMC5554409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.