Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800583›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The nucleoid protein Dps binds genomic DNA of Escherichia coli in a non-random manner.

S S Antipov, M N Tutukina, E V Preobrazhenskaya, F A Kondrashov, M V Patrushev, S V Toshchakov, I Dominova, U S Shvyreva, V V Vrublevskaya, O S Morenkov and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dps binds and protects DNA in starvedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Structural and Binding Properties of Dps - A Nucleoid Associated Protein.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Dps Protein ProtectsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complementary Roles of Two DNA Protection Proteins fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S S AntipovDepartment of Functional Genomics and Cellular Stress, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-1428
M N TutukinaDepartment of Functional Genomics and Cellular Stress, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8876-4707
E V PreobrazhenskayaDepartment of Functional Genomics and Cellular Stress, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7523-6593
F A KondrashovBioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) Barcelona, Spain.
M V PatrushevDepartment of Genomics of Microorganisms, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-9283
S V ToshchakovDepartment of Genomics of Microorganisms, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation.
I DominovaDepartment of Genomics of Microorganisms, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation.
U S ShvyrevaDepartment of Functional Genomics and Cellular Stress, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.
V V VrublevskayaDepartment of Cell Culture and Cell Engeneering, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.
O S MorenkovDepartment of Cell Culture and Cell Engeneering, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.
N A SukharichevaDepartment of Functional Genomics and Cellular Stress, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-232X
V V PanyukovDepartment of Structural and Functional Genomics,-Pushchino Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.
O N OzolineDepartment of Functional Genomics and Cellular Stress, Institute of Cell Biophysics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-375X
Institute of Cell Biophysics · RUImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal University · RUInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESPushchino State Institute of Natural Sciences · RUUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dps is a multifunctional homododecameric protein that oxidizes Fe2+ ions accumulating them in the form of Fe2O3 within its protein cavity, interacts with DNA tightly condensing bacterial nucleoid upon starvation and performs some other functions. During the last two decades from discovery of this protein, its ferroxidase activity became rather well studied, but the mechanism of Dps interaction with DNA still remains enigmatic. The crucial role of lysine residues in the unstructured N-terminal tails led to the conventional point of view that Dps binds DNA without sequence or structural specificity. However, deletion of dps changed the profile of proteins in starved cells, SELEX screen revealed genomic regions preferentially bound in vitro and certain affinity of Dps for artificial branched molecules was detected by atomic force microscopy. Here we report a non-random distribution of Dps binding sites across the bacterial chromosome in exponentially growing cells and show their enrichment with inverted repeats prone to form secondary structures. We found that the Dps-bound regions overlap with sites occupied by other nucleoid proteins, and contain overrepresented motifs typical for their consensus sequences. Of the two types of genomic domains with extensive protein occupancy, which can be highly expressed or transcriptionally silent only those that are enriched with RNA polymerase molecules were preferentially occupied by Dps. In the dps-null mutant we, therefore, observed a differentially altered expression of several targeted genes and found suppressed transcription from the dps promoter. In most cases this can be explained by the relieved interference with Dps for nucleoid proteins exploiting sequence-specific modes of DNA binding. Thus, protecting bacterial cells from different stresses during exponential growth, Dps can modulate transcriptional integrity of the bacterial chromosome hampering RNA biosynthesis from some genes via competition with RNA polymerase or, vice versa, competing with inhibitors to activate transcription.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesChromosome MappingChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliInverted Repeat SequencesMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDPS protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID28800583
PMCPMC5553809
OpenAlexW2744352902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.