Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800581›Full record

ArticleComputers, informatics, nursing : CIN2017

Implementation of Electronic Health Records in US Nursing Homes.

Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir, Carolyn T A Herzig, Jasmine L Travers, Nicholas G Castle, Patricia W Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Time to Strategically Position Nursing Homes to Effectively Manage Emerging Infections.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2020
    Article
  17. Adoption of Health Information Technology Among US Nursing Facilities.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ragnhildur I BjarnadottirAuthor Affiliations: Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing (Drs Bjarnadottir, Herzig, Stone, and Travers); and Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health (Dr Herzig), New York, NY; and Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA (Dr Castle).
Carolyn T A Herzig
Jasmine L Travers
Nicholas G Castle
Patricia W Stone

Funding

Study of Infection Management and Palliative Care at End-of-Life (SIMP-EL)R01NR013687 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STONE, PATRICIA W. · 2012 to 2020
$5.8M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While electronic health records have emerged as promising tools to help improve quality of care, nursing homes have lagged behind in implementation. This study assessed electronic health records implementation, associated facility characteristics, and potential impact on quality indicators in nursing homes. Using national Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and survey data for nursing homes, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted to identify variations between nursing homes that had and had not implemented electronic health records. A difference-in-differences analysis was used to estimate the longitudinal effect of electronic health records on commonly used quality indicators. Data from 927 nursing homes were examined, 49.1% of which had implemented electronic health records. Nursing homes with electronic health records were more likely to be nonprofit/government owned (P = .04) and had a lower percentage of Medicaid residents (P = .02) and higher certified nursing assistant and registered nurse staffing levels (P = .002 and .02, respectively). Difference-in-differences analysis showed greater quality improvements after implementation for five long-stay and two short-stay quality measures (P = .001 and .01, respectively) compared with those who did not implement electronic health records. Implementation rates in nursing homes are low compared with other settings, and better-resourced facilities are more likely to have implemented electronic health records. Consistent with other settings, electronic health records implementation improves quality in nursing homes, but further research is needed to better understand the mechanism for improvement and how it can best be supported.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Cross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsHumansNursing HomesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28800581
PMCPMC5555048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.