Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800287›Full record

ReviewRadiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc

Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models.

Elizabeth George, Peter Liacouras, Frank J Rybicki, Dimitrios Mitsouras

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 271 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. From Pixels to Prototypes: 3D Printing Innovations in Radiology.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Custom 3D-Printed Molds for Zebrafish Imaging and Cardiac Development.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth GeorgeFrom the Applied Imaging Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (E.G., D.M.); 3D Medical Applications Center, Department of Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md (P.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (F.J.R.).
Peter LiacourasFrom the Applied Imaging Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (E.G., D.M.); 3D Medical Applications Center, Department of Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md (P.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (F.J.R.).
Frank J RybickiFrom the Applied Imaging Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (E.G., D.M.); 3D Medical Applications Center, Department of Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md (P.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (F.J.R.).
Dimitrios MitsourasFrom the Applied Imaging Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (E.G., D.M.); 3D Medical Applications Center, Department of Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md (P.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (F.J.R.).
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Quantitative Coronary Hemodynamics Derived from CT AngiographyK01EB015868 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MITSOURAS, DIMITRIOS · 2013 to 2015
$520k
NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB015868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the rapid growth of three-dimensional (3D) printing applications in medicine, the accuracy and reproducibility of 3D printed medical models have not been thoroughly investigated. Although current technologies enable 3D models to be created with accuracy within the limits of clinical imaging spatial resolutions, this is not always achieved in practice. Inaccuracies are due to errors that occur during the imaging, segmentation, postprocessing, and 3D printing steps. Radiologists' understanding of the factors that influence 3D printed model accuracy and the metrics used to measure this accuracy is key in directing appropriate practices and establishing reference standards and validation procedures. The authors review the various factors in each step of the 3D model printing process that contribute to model inaccuracy, including the intrinsic limitations of each printing technology. In addition, common sources of model inaccuracy are illustrated. Metrics involving comparisons of model dimensions and morphology that have been developed to quantify differences between 3D models also are described and illustrated. These metrics can be used to define the accuracy of a model, as compared with the reference standard, and to measure the variability of models created by different observers or using different workflows. The accuracies reported for specific indications of 3D printing are summarized, and potential guidelines for quality assurance and workflow assessment are discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingModels, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReference StandardsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID28800287
PMCPMC5621728
OpenAlexW2742750442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.