Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800266›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2018

Impact of shared decision making on asthma quality of life and asthma control among children.

Yhenneko J Taylor, Hazel Tapp, Lindsay E Shade, Tsai-Ling Liu, Jessica Lauren Mowrer, Michael F Dulin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sociocultural influences on asthma self-management in a multicultural society: A qualitative study amongst Malaysian adults.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The Challenges and Opportunities for Shared Decision Making Highlighted by COVID-19.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yhenneko J Taylora Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , North Carolina , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-5666
Hazel Tappa Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , North Carolina , USA.
Lindsay E Shadea Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , North Carolina , USA.
Tsai-Ling Liua Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , North Carolina , USA.
Jessica Lauren Mowrera Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , North Carolina , USA.
Michael F Dulina Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , North Carolina , USA.

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Asthma Interventions Within an AHRQ PBRNR18HS019946 · AHRQ · CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DULIN, MICHAEL F · 2010 to 2010
$2.9M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS019946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew studies have examined the effectiveness of shared decision making (SDM) in clinical practice. This study evaluated the impact of SDM on quality of life and symptom control in children with asthma.

methodsWe conducted a prospective 3-year study in six community-based practices serving a low-income patient population. Practices received training on SDM using an evidence-based toolkit. Patients aged 2-17 with a diagnosis of asthma were identified from scheduling and billing data. At approximate 6-month intervals, patients completed a survey consisting of the Mini Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (range 1-7) and the control domain of the Pediatric Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (range 0-7). We used propensity scores to match 46 children receiving SDM to 46 children receiving usual care with decision support. Included children had completed a baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey. Random coefficient models incorporated repeated measures to assess the effect of SDM on asthma quality of life and asthma control.

resultsThe sample was primarily of non-White patients (94.6%) with Medicaid insurance (92.4%). Receipt of SDM using an evidence-based toolkit was associated with higher asthma quality of life [mean difference 0.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.4] and fewer asthma control problems (mean difference -0.9; 95% CI -1.6--0.2) compared to usual care with decision support.

conclusionsImplementation of SDM within clinical practices using a standardized toolkit is associated with improved asthma quality of life and asthma control for low-income children with asthma when compared to usual care with decision support.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationQuality of LifeAdolescentAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolClinical Decision-MakingCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMaleNorth CarolinaPovertyProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesAsthma therapy assessment questionnaire (ATAQ)Medicaidmini asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ)practice-based researchpropensity score

Identifiers

PMID28800266
PMCPMC7229989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.