Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800182›Full record

ArticleThe American journal on addictions2017

Development and preliminary pilot evaluation of a brief tablet computer intervention to motivate tobacco quitline use among smokers in substance use treatment.

Richard A Brown, Jacki Hecht, Erika L Bloom, Haruka Minami, Christopher W Kahler, Ana M Abrantes, Mary E Dubreuil, Alan Gordon, Lawrence H Price, Steven J Ondersma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal on addictions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard A BrownButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jacki HechtButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Erika L BloomButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0212-6489
Haruka MinamiButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Christopher W KahlerCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies and the Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ana M AbrantesButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Mary E DubreuilButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Alan GordonButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Lawrence H PriceButler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Steven J OndersmaMerrill-Palmer Skillman Institute and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Providence College · USBrown University · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Brief computer intervention to motivate quitline use for smokers in SUD treatmentR34DA034312 · NIDA · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI BROWN, RICHARD A · 2012 to 2013
$584k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA034312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe majority of individuals in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment also smoke cigarettes; yet, the availability of smoking cessation services in SUD treatment remains limited. In this study, we developed and piloted a brief intervention for smokers in SUD treatment intended to motivate engagement in tobacco quitline treatment (TIME-TQ).

methodsFirst, we interviewed 19 smokers in SUD treatment to inform the development of TIME-TQ (Phase 1). Second, we delivered a prototype TIME-TQ to 16 smokers in the same SUD treatment program and followed them for 3 months post-discharge (Phase 2).

resultsFeedback from Phase 1 participants was used to refine response choices and video segments included in the prototype TIME-TQ. Phase 2 participants rated TIME-TQ high on relevance, interest, respectfulness, and helpfulness. Additionally, they reported significant increases in readiness to quit and perceived importance of quitting after receiving TIME-TQ. A total of 8 of the 16 accepted a quitline referral, and 8 of 13 reached for follow-up (four referral acceptors, four decliners) reported efforts to quit or reduce smoking during the follow-up period. However, only three received quitline counseling and none achieved a sustained period of abstinence. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that TIME-TQ activated these patients to quit smoking, but our referral method (standard fax referral) was unsuccessful in helping participants fully engage in quitline treatment or achieving a period of abstinence. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: We are now conducting an RCT to evaluate TIME-TQ with a revised referral procedure intended to increase treatment engagement and, ultimately, abstinence rates. (Am J Addict 2017;26:587-594).

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldHotlinesSmoking CessationSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsSmokingSmoking Prevention

Identifiers

PMID28800182
PMCPMC5892843
OpenAlexW2742664883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.