Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28800066›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Treatment of the First Acute Relapse Following Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Formerly Glucocorticosteroid-Unresponsive Multiple Sclerosis Patients-A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Glucocorticosteroid Responsiveness.

Johannes Ehler, Stephan Blechinger, Paulus S Rommer, Sebastian Koball, Steffen Mitzner, Hans-Peter Hartung, Fritz Leutmezer, Martin Sauer, Uwe K Zettl

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Multiple Sclerosis 2017.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johannes EhlerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany. johannes.ehler@med.uni-rostock.de.
Stephan BlechingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. stephan.blechinger@meduniwien.ac.at.
Paulus S RommerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. paulus.rommer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Sebastian KoballDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany. sebastian.koball@uni-rostock.de.
Steffen MitznerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany. steffen.mitzner@med.uni-rostock.de.
Hans-Peter HartungDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de.
Fritz LeutmezerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. fritz.leutmezer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Martin SauerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany. martin.sauer@uni-rostock.de.
Uwe K ZettlDepartment of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University of Rostock, 18147 Rostock, Germany. uwe.zettl@med.uni-rostock.de.
University of Rostock · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic options to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses comprise glucocorticosteroids (GCS) as first-line and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) as second-line treatments in GCS-unresponsive patients. No guidelines exist for the treatment of another relapse following TPE. We retrospectively analyzed the responsiveness to GCS in a subsequent relapse following TPE in previously GCS-unresponsive MS patients. Thirty-seven patients with GCS-unresponsive MS relapses received TPE (relapse A). All patients developed another relapse after the completion of TPE and received GCS again (relapse B). The primary study endpoint was the clinical response to GCS and TPE. Marked improvement was defined as clinically significant improvement in function, moderate improvement as a definite change of symptoms without significant impact on function, no effect comprised unchanged symptoms, and deterioration a worsening of symptoms or new deficits. The secondary endpoint was an improvement in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scoring. All patients were GCS-unresponsive during relapse A and received TPE. During GCS treatment of relapse B, marked improvement was observed in 10, moderate improvement in 24, and no effect in three patients. The EDSS decreased in 15 patients. GCS might remain the first-line relapse treatment following TPE in formerly GCS-unresponsive MS patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPlasma ExchangeAdrenal Cortex Hormonesdemyelinationdisease modifying therapiesoutcome measurementsteroidstreatment response

Identifiers

PMID28800066
PMCPMC5578139
OpenAlexW2742883377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.