Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28799899›Full record

ReviewCell host & microbe2017

The Gut Microbiota, Food Science, and Human Nutrition: A Timely Marriage.

Michael J Barratt, Carlito Lebrilla, Howard-Yana Shapiro, Jeffrey I Gordon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell host & microbe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael J BarrattCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Center for Gut Microbiome and Nutrition Research, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Carlito LebrillaDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Howard-Yana ShapiroDepartment of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Jeffrey I GordonCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Center for Gut Microbiome and Nutrition Research, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: jgordon@wustl.edu.

Funding

Trace the flow of genes in the gut microbiome of obese and lean twin pairsP01DK078669 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAIN, JAMES · 2007 to 2018
$16.0M
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION - SMALL INTESTINER01DK030292 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY I GORDON, ANDREI L OSTERMAN · 1986 to 2026
$6.5M
GUT MICROBIOTA AND OBESITY: STUDIES IN GNOTOBIOTIC MICER01DK070977 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GORDON, JEFFREY I, HETTICH, ROBERT L. · 2005 to 2020
$6.3M
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION IN THE SMALL INTESTINER37DK030292 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GORDON, JEFFREY I · 1993 to 2015
$4.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK078669NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK030292NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070977NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK030292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analytic advances are enabling more precise definitions of the molecular composition of key food staples incorporated into contemporary diets and how the nutrient landscapes of these staples vary as a function of cultivar and food processing methods. This knowledge, combined with insights about the interrelationship between consumer microbiota configurations and biotransformation of food ingredients, should have a number of effects on agriculture, food production, and strategies for improving the nutritional value of foods and health status. These effects include decision-making about which cultivars of current or future food staples to incorporate into existing and future food systems, and which components of waste streams from current or future food manufacturing processes have nutritional value that is worth capturing. They can also guide which technologies should be applied, or need to be developed, to produce foods that support efficient microbial biotransformation of their ingredients into metabolic products that sustain health.

Indexed as

FoodFood TechnologyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgricultureAnimalsDietFood HandlingFood IngredientsHealth StatusHumansNutritive ValueFood Ingredientsagricultural sustainabilitybiochemical characterization of food staplesdesigning food systemsdietary glycansfood sciencegnotobiotic animal modelsgut microbiotamicrobial biotransformation of food ingredientsmicrobiota-directed foods

Identifiers

PMID28799899
PMCPMC5915309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.